IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v273y2022ics0378377422004164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-model ensemble approaches for simulation of evapotranspiration of karst agroforestry ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Rongfei
  • Xu, Xianli
  • Guo, Jingsong
  • Sheng, Zhuping

Abstract

Water shortages frequently occur in karst areas, and there is an urgent need to quantify water fluxes to provide information for sustainable management of water resources. Thus, a variety of models have been developed to simulate the water balance process, including actual evapotranspiration (ETc), which is a key variable for linking water and energy cycles. However, high heterogeneity of the land surface makes it hard to get precise complete set of parameters for single model, and a single model often has uncertainties in simulating evapotranspiration in karst regions. Therefore, this study integrated three well-known individual models (Penman-Monteith, PM; Priestley and Taylor, PT; and Shuttleworth-Wallace, SW) with two multi-model ensemble approaches (Bayesian model averaging, BMA; and simple model average, SA) to enhance ETc modeling in a subtropical humid karst catchment. Results show that: 1) The individual models show different strengths for different ecosystems, which could be attributed to differences in the underlying landscape surface characteristics; 2) individual models exhibited seasonal uncertainties. For example, simulated ETc (ETs) by the PM and PT model was lower than ETo (observed ETc) during November-March but higher than during April-October for forest-grass mixed and grass ecosystems; 3) Two multi-model ensemble approaches (R2 ≥ 0.85) performed better than any individual model (R2 ≤ 0.85) most likely because multi-model ensemble approaches reduce model uncertainties by weakening the bias of individual models.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Rongfei & Xu, Xianli & Guo, Jingsong & Sheng, Zhuping, 2022. "Multi-model ensemble approaches for simulation of evapotranspiration of karst agroforestry ecosystems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:273:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422004164
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422004164
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107869?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cramer, Viki A. & Thorburn, Peter J. & Fraser, Grant W., 1999. "Transpiration and groundwater uptake from farm forest plots of Casuarina glauca and Eucalyptus camaldulensis in saline areas of southeast Queensland, Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(2-3), pages 187-204, February.
    2. Gharsallah, O. & Facchi, A. & Gandolfi, C., 2013. "Comparison of six evapotranspiration models for a surface irrigated maize agro-ecosystem in Northern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 119-130.
    3. Utset, Angel & Farre, Imma & Martinez-Cob, Antonio & Cavero, Jose, 2004. "Comparing Penman-Monteith and Priestley-Taylor approaches as reference-evapotranspiration inputs for modeling maize water-use under Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 205-219, May.
    4. Balwinder-Singh, & Eberbach, P.L. & Humphreys, E., 2014. "Simulation of the evaporation of soil water beneath a wheat crop canopy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 19-26.
    5. Huaping Huang & Zhongmin Liang & Binquan Li & Dong Wang & Yiming Hu & Yujie Li, 2019. "Combination of Multiple Data-Driven Models for Long-Term Monthly Runoff Predictions Based on Bayesian Model Averaging," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(9), pages 3321-3338, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gong, Xuewen & Qiu, Rangjian & Ge, Jiankun & Bo, Guokui & Ping, Yinglu & Xin, Qingsong & Wang, Shunsheng, 2021. "Evapotranspiration partitioning of greenhouse grown tomato using a modified Priestley–Taylor model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Zhiqiang Jiang & Zhengyang Tang & Yi Liu & Yuyun Chen & Zhongkai Feng & Yang Xu & Hairong Zhang, 2019. "Area Moment and Error Based Forecasting Difficulty and its Application in Inflow Forecasting Level Evaluation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(13), pages 4553-4568, October.
    3. Liu, Yi & Zeng, Wenzhi & Ao, Chang & Lei, Guoqing & Wu, Jingwei & Huang, Jiesheng & Gaiser, Thomas & Srivastava, Amit Kumar, 2022. "Optimization of winter irrigation management for salinized farmland using a coupled model of soil water flow and crop growth," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Ali Rahimikhoob, 2014. "Comparison between M5 Model Tree and Neural Networks for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration in an Arid Environment," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(3), pages 657-669, February.
    5. Hlavinka, Petr & Trnka, Miroslav & Balek, Jan & Semerádová, Daniela & Hayes, Michael & Svoboda, Mark & Eitzinger, Josef & Mozný, Martin & Fischer, Milan & Hunt, Eric & Zalud, Zdenek, 2011. "Development and evaluation of the SoilClim model for water balance and soil climate estimates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(8), pages 1249-1261, May.
    6. Ali Rahimikhoob & Mahmood Behbahani & Javad Fakheri, 2012. "An Evaluation of Four Reference Evapotranspiration Models in a Subtropical Climate," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(10), pages 2867-2881, August.
    7. Li, Xianyue & Yang, Peiling & Ren, Shumei & Li, Yunkai & Liu, Honglu & Du, Jun & Li, Pingfeng & Wang, Caiyuan & Ren, Liang, 2010. "Modeling cherry orchard evapotranspiration based on an improved dual-source model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 12-18, December.
    8. Haofang Yan & Song Huang & Jianyun Zhang & Chuan Zhang & Guoqing Wang & Lanlan Li & Shuang Zhao & Mi Li & Baoshan Zhao, 2022. "Comparison of Shuttleworth–Wallace and Dual Crop Coefficient Method for Estimating Evapotranspiration of a Tea Field in Southeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Chunwei & Cui, Ningbo & Wu, Youjie & Wang, Zhenchang & Li, Gen, 2019. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified Priestley-Taylor model in a rice-wheat rotation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Hajirahimi, Zahra & Khashei, Mehdi, 2022. "Series Hybridization of Parallel (SHOP) models for time series forecasting," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 596(C).
    11. Pengrui Ai & Yingjie Ma, 2020. "Estimation of Evapotranspiration of a Jujube/Cotton Intercropping System in an Arid Area Based on the Dual Crop Coefficient Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Kodur, S., 2017. "Improving the prediction of soil evaporation for different soil types under dryland cropping," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 131-141.
    13. Farshid Rezaei & Rezvane Ghorbani & Najmeh Mahjouri, 2022. "Improving Daily and Monthly River Discharge Forecasts using Geostatistical Ensemble Modeling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(13), pages 5063-5089, October.
    14. Alexandris, S. & Kerkides, P. & Liakatas, A., 2006. "Daily reference evapotranspiration estimates by the "Copais" approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 371-386, April.
    15. Landeras, Gorka & Ortiz-Barredo, Amaia & López, Jose Javier, 2008. "Comparison of artificial neural network models and empirical and semi-empirical equations for daily reference evapotranspiration estimation in the Basque Country (Northern Spain)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 553-565, May.
    16. Minhas, P.S. & Yadav, R.K. & Bali, Aradhana, 2020. "Perspectives on reviving waterlogged and saline soils through plantation forestry," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    17. Rong, Yao & Dai, Xiaoqin & Wang, Weishu & Wu, Peijin & Huo, Zailin, 2023. "Dependence of evapotranspiration validity on shallow groundwater in arid area-a three years field observation experiment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    18. Minhas, P.S. & Yadav, R.K. & Lal, K. & Chaturvedi, R.K., 2015. "Effect of long-term irrigation with wastewater on growth, biomass production and water use by Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm.) planted at variable stocking density," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 151-160.
    19. Utset, Angel & Martinez-Cob, Antonio & Farre, Imma & Cavero, Jose, 2006. "Simulating the effects of extreme dry and wet years on the water use of flooding-irrigated maize in a Mediterranean landplane," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(1-2), pages 77-84, September.
    20. Dokoohaki, Hamze & Gheysari, Mahdi & Mousavi, Sayed-Farhad & Zand-Parsa, Shahrokh & Miguez, Fernando E. & Archontoulis, Sotirios V. & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2016. "Coupling and testing a new soil water module in DSSAT CERES-Maize model for maize production under semi-arid condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 90-99.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:273:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422004164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.