IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v226y2019ics0378377418317116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disk-till vs. no-till maize grass- and alfalfa-reference single (average) and basal (dual) crop coefficients

Author

Listed:
  • Irmak, Suat
  • Kukal, Meetpal S.

Abstract

Disk-till (DT) and no-till (NT) maize (Zea mays L.) water use, crop growth characteristics, and microclimatic differences have been shown to differ. With these differences, it becomes essential that maize be managed differently under these tillage practices in terms of irrigation, and hence, it is indispensable that tools to effectively implement irrigation management be developed. However, water management tools such as crop coefficients that account for tillage practices are extremely rare. To investigate and develop better management tools, this research aimed to develop single (average) (Kc) and basal (dual) (Kcb) daily grass- and alfalfa reference crop coefficients (Kco and Kcr, respectively) using measured crop evapotranspiration at two carefully and cautiously -managed producer fields (disk-till and no-till fields) at Holdrege, Nebraska for 2011, 2012, and 2013 growing seasons. Both Kc and Kcb differed among DT and NT maize in that NT maize showed lower Kc and Kcb during pre-anthesis and higher Kc and Kcb during post-anthesis, and the period of maximum Kc and Kcb occurred later in the crop growing season. Specifically, the magnitude of these differences in Kc values were 56%, 29%, 1%, 8%, 47%, and 41% for May, June, July, August, September, and October, respectively, i.e., greater in early and late season, but smaller in mid-season. Kcb presented similar trends within the season. Kcb exhibited 70% lower magnitudes than Kc, due to minimized evaporation effects on or around precipitation events and hence had reasonably strong relationship with leaf area index. Daily crop coefficients were correlated with two types of base scales: days after planting (DAP) and cumulative growing degree days (CGDD). It is demonstrated with evidence that CGDD was a better predictor of seasonal variation in Kc and Kcb. The relationships between Kc (both Kcr and Kco) and Kcb (both Kcbr and Kcbo) vs. DAP and CGDD for both DT and NT maize during the three growing seasons in the form of transferable polynomial equations were also presented. The crop coefficients for DT and NT maize and their estimation equations presented in this research are novel and have immense application in the task of accurate quantification of maize evapotranspiration and manage irrigation under these two contrasting tillage systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Irmak, Suat & Kukal, Meetpal S., 2019. "Disk-till vs. no-till maize grass- and alfalfa-reference single (average) and basal (dual) crop coefficients," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:226:y:2019:i:c:s0378377418317116
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418317116
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rose, C. W. & Sharma, M. L., 1984. "Summary and recommendations of the Workshop on "Evapotranspiration from plant communities"," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(1-3), pages 325-342, January.
    2. Irmak, Suat & Kukal, Meetpal S. & Mohammed, Ali T. & Djaman, Koffi, 2019. "Disk-till vs. no-till maize evapotranspiration, microclimate, grain yield, production functions and water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 177-195.
    3. Piccinni, Giovanni & Ko, Jonghan & Marek, Thomas & Howell, Terry, 2009. "Determination of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients (KC) of maize and sorghum," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1698-1704, December.
    4. Ko, Jonghan & Piccinni, Giovanni & Marek, Thomas & Howell, Terry, 2009. "Determination of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients (Kc) of cotton and wheat," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1691-1697, December.
    5. Kang, Shaozhong & Gu, Binjie & Du, Taisheng & Zhang, Jianhua, 2003. "Crop coefficient and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize in a semi-humid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 239-254, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Yueyue & Horton, Robert & Xue, Xuzhang & Ren, Tusheng, 2021. "Partitioning evapotranspiration by measuring soil water evaporation with heat-pulse sensors and plant transpiration with sap flow gauges," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Nana & Liu, Yu & Cai, Jiabing & Paredes, Paula & Rosa, Ricardo D. & Pereira, Luis S., 2013. "Dual crop coefficient modelling applied to the winter wheat–summer maize crop sequence in North China Plain: Basal crop coefficients and soil evaporation component," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 93-105.
    2. Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Chunwei & Cui, Ningbo & Wu, Youjie & Wang, Zhenchang & Li, Gen, 2019. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified Priestley-Taylor model in a rice-wheat rotation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Qiu, Rangjian & Li, Longan & Liu, Chunwei & Wang, Zhenchang & Zhang, Baozhong & Liu, Zhandong, 2022. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified crop coefficient model in a rotated rice-winter wheat system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Yang, Pengju & Hu, Hongchang & Tian, Fuqiang & Zhang, Zhi & Dai, Chao, 2016. "Crop coefficient for cotton under plastic mulch and drip irrigation based on eddy covariance observation in an arid area of northwestern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 21-30.
    5. Wang, Yunfei & Cai, Huanjie & Yu, Lianyu & Peng, Xiongbiao & Xu, Jiatun & Wang, Xiaowen, 2020. "Evapotranspiration partitioning and crop coefficient of maize in dry semi-humid climate regime," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    6. Drerup, Philipp & Brueck, Holger & Scherer, Heinrich W., 2017. "Evapotranspiration of winter wheat estimated with the FAO 56 approach and NDVI measurements in a temperate humid climate of NW Europe," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 180-188.
    7. Irmak, Suat & Sharma, Vasudha & Haghverdi, Amir & Jhala, Amit & Payero, José O. & Drudik, Matthew, 2021. "Maize Crop Coefficients under Variable and Fixed (Uniform) Rate Irrigation and Conventional and Variable Rate Fertilizer Management in Three Soil Types," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    8. Komlan Koudahe & Aleksey Y. Sheshukov & Jonathan Aguilar & Koffi Djaman, 2021. "Irrigation-Water Management and Productivity of Cotton: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Rosa, R.D. & Ramos, T.B. & Pereira, L.S., 2016. "The dual Kc approach to assess maize and sweet sorghum transpiration and soil evaporation under saline conditions: Application of the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 77-94.
    10. Muniandy, Josilva M. & Yusop, Zulkifli & Askari, Muhamad, 2016. "Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration models and determination of crop coefficient for Momordica charantia and Capsicum annuum," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 77-89.
    11. Mhawej, Mario & Nasrallah, Ali & Abunnasr, Yaser & Fadel, Ali & Faour, Ghaleb, 2021. "Better irrigation management using the satellite-based adjusted single crop coefficient (aKc) for over sixty crop types in California, USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    12. Meysam ABEDINPOUR, 2015. "Evaluation of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients of maize using weighing lysimeter," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 99-104.
    13. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    14. Kumar, Vipan & Udeigwe, Theophilus K. & Clawson, Ernest L. & Rohli, Robert V. & Miller, Donnie K., 2015. "Crop water use and stage-specific crop coefficients for irrigated cotton in the mid-south, United States," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 63-69.
    15. Raphael, O.D. & Ogedengbe, K. & Fasinmirin, J.T. & Okunade, D. & Akande, I. & Gbadamosi, A., 2018. "Growth-stage-specific crop coefficient and consumptive use of Capsicum chinense using hydraulic weighing lysimeter," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 179-185.
    16. Gloaguen, Romain M. & Rowland, Diane L. & Brym, Zachary T. & Wilson, Chris. H. & Chun, Hyen Chung & Langham, Ray, 2021. "A METHOD FOR DEVELOPING IRRIGATION DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS de novo: EXAMPLE OF SESAME (Sesamum indicum L.) A KNOWN DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    17. Campi, P. & Palumbo, A.D. & Mastrorilli, M., 2012. "Evapotranspiration estimation of crops protected by windbreak in a Mediterranean region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 153-162.
    18. Xu, Gaoping & Xue, Xuzhang & Wang, Pu & Yang, Zhaoshun & Yuan, Wenya & Liu, Xiufeng & Lou, Chenjun, 2018. "A lysimeter study for the effects of different canopy sizes on evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of summer maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1-6.
    19. Miao, Qingfeng & Rosa, Ricardo D. & Shi, Haibin & Paredes, Paula & Zhu, Li & Dai, Jiaxin & Gonçalves, José M. & Pereira, Luis S., 2016. "Modeling water use, transpiration and soil evaporation of spring wheat–maize and spring wheat–sunflower relay intercropping using the dual crop coefficient approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 211-229.
    20. Anapalli, Saseendran S. & Fisher, Daniel K. & Pinnamaneni, Srinivasa Rao & Reddy, Krishna N., 2020. "Quantifying evapotranspiration and crop coefficients for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using an eddy covariance approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:226:y:2019:i:c:s0378377418317116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.