IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v146y2014icp131-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling relations of tomato yield and fruit quality with water deficit at different growth stages under greenhouse condition

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Jinliang
  • Kang, Shaozhong
  • Du, Taisheng
  • Guo, Ping
  • Qiu, Rangjian
  • Chen, Renqiang
  • Gu, Feng

Abstract

Nowadays more and more attentions are paid to fruit quality in the production of tomato. In order to better understand the effects of deficit irrigation on tomato yield and fruit quality, four years of deficit irrigation experiments were investigated to simulate water-yield and water-fruit quality relationships of tomato in greenhouses. The yield and fruit quality parameters like total soluble solids (TSS), reducing sugars (RS), organic acids (OA), sugar/acid content ratio (SAR), vitamin C (VC), firmness (Fn), color index (CI) were correlated with seasonal evapotranspiration (ET) and ET deficit at flowering and fruit development stage (Stage II) and fruit ripening stage (Stage III) using linear regression. Three water-yield models (Jensen, Stewart, Minhas) and three water-fruit quality models (multiplicative, additive, exponential) were applied to simulate the relationships of tomato yield and fruit quality parameters with water deficit at various growth stages. The water deficit sensitivity indexes (λ/Ky/δ or γ/Kq/ψ) of the models were calculated with the method of multiply linear regression. The performance and sensitivity analysis of the models were evaluated. Results showed that the relative yield decreased linearly with the drop of relative seasonal ET, mainly due to the yield depression by ET deficit at Stage II and Stage III; the relative values of fruit quality parameters increased with the drop of relative seasonal ET, mostly because of the enhancement by ET deficit at Stage III. The calculated water deficit sensitivity indexes indicated that both the yield and fruit quality were hardly sensitive to water deficit at Stage I, but sensitive to water deficit at Stage II and that at Stage III; TSS, RS, SAR and VC were much more sensitive to water deficit at Stage III than that at Stage II; RS, SAR and VC were more sensitive to water deficit than TSS, OA, Fn and CI. The Minhas model with its water deficit sensitivity indexes was recommended to simulate water-yield relations of greenhouse tomato in the study area; multiplicative model and additive model were, respectively, recommended to simulate the relationships of fruit quality parameters like TSS, RS, SAR, Fn and fruit quality parameters like OA, VC, CI with water deficit at various growth stages. The water-yield and water-fruit quality models would be helpful to optimally allocate irrigation water during the growth season, thus achieving efficient production of tomato in greenhouses in consideration of the compromise between tomato yield and fruit quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Jinliang & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Guo, Ping & Qiu, Rangjian & Chen, Renqiang & Gu, Feng, 2014. "Modeling relations of tomato yield and fruit quality with water deficit at different growth stages under greenhouse condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 131-148.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:146:y:2014:i:c:p:131-148
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837741400225X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Heping & Oweis, Theib, 1999. "Water-yield relations and optimal irrigation scheduling of wheat in the Mediterranean region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 195-211, January.
    2. Rao, N. H. & Sarma, P. B. S. & Chander, Subhash, 1988. "A simple dated water-production function for use in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 25-32, April.
    3. Paredes, P. & Rodrigues, G.C. & Alves, I. & Pereira, L.S., 2014. "Partitioning evapotranspiration, yield prediction and economic returns of maize under various irrigation management strategies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 27-39.
    4. Zheng, Jianhua & Huang, Guanhua & Jia, Dongdong & Wang, Jun & Mota, Mariana & Pereira, Luis S. & Huang, Quanzhong & Xu, Xu & Liu, Haijun, 2013. "Responses of drip irrigated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) yield, quality and water productivity to various soil matric potential thresholds in an arid region of Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 181-193.
    5. Kirda, C. & Cetin, M. & Dasgan, Y. & Topcu, S. & Kaman, H. & Ekici, B. & Derici, M. R. & Ozguven, A. I., 2004. "Yield response of greenhouse grown tomato to partial root drying and conventional deficit irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 191-201, October.
    6. Igbadun, Henry E. & Tarimo, Andrew K.P.R. & Salim, Baanda A. & Mahoo, Henry F., 2007. "Evaluation of selected crop water production functions for an irrigated maize crop," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(1-3), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Chen, Jinliang & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Qiu, Rangjian & Guo, Ping & Chen, Renqiang, 2013. "Quantitative response of greenhouse tomato yield and quality to water deficit at different growth stages," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 152-162.
    8. Kuşçu, Hayrettin & Turhan, Ahmet & Demir, Ali Osman, 2014. "The response of processing tomato to deficit irrigation at various phenological stages in a sub-humid environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 92-103.
    9. Wang, Feng & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Li, Fusheng & Qiu, Rangjian, 2011. "Determination of comprehensive quality index for tomato and its response to different irrigation treatments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(8), pages 1228-1238, May.
    10. Allen, Richard G. & Pereira, Luis S. & Howell, Terry A. & Jensen, Marvin E., 2011. "Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 899-920, April.
    11. Ngouajio, Mathieu & Wang, Guangyao & Goldy, Ronald, 2007. "Withholding of drip irrigation between transplanting and flowering increases the yield of field-grown tomato under plastic mulch," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 285-291, February.
    12. Ozbahce, Aynur & Tari, Ali Fuat, 2010. "Effects of different emitter space and water stress on yield and quality of processing tomato under semi-arid climate conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(9), pages 1405-1410, September.
    13. Qiu, Rangjian & Song, Jinjuan & Du, Taisheng & Kang, Shaozhong & Tong, Ling & Chen, Renqiang & Wu, Laosheng, 2013. "Response of evapotranspiration and yield to planting density of solar greenhouse grown tomato in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 44-51.
    14. Glen L. Wheeler & Mark A. Jones & Nicholas Smirnoff, 1998. "The biosynthetic pathway of vitamin C in higher plants," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6683), pages 365-369, May.
    15. Patanè, C. & Cosentino, S.L., 2010. "Effects of soil water deficit on yield and quality of processing tomato under a Mediterranean climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 131-138, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Huimeng & Xiong, Yunwu & Huang, Guanhua & Xu, Xu & Huang, Quanzhong, 2017. "Effects of water stress on processing tomatoes yield, quality and water use efficiency with plastic mulched drip irrigation in sandy soil of the Hetao Irrigation District," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 205-214.
    2. Wang, Chenxia & Gu, Feng & Chen, Jinliang & Yang, Hui & Jiang, Jingjing & Du, Taisheng & Zhang, Jianhua, 2015. "Assessing the response of yield and comprehensive fruit quality of tomato grown in greenhouse to deficit irrigation and nitrogen application strategies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 9-19.
    3. Yang, Hui & Du, Taisheng & Qiu, Rangjian & Chen, Jinliang & Wang, Feng & Li, Yang & Wang, Chenxia & Gao, Lihong & Kang, Shaozhong, 2017. "Improved water use efficiency and fruit quality of greenhouse crops under regulated deficit irrigation in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 193-204.
    4. Chen, Jinliang & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Qiu, Rangjian & Guo, Ping & Chen, Renqiang, 2013. "Quantitative response of greenhouse tomato yield and quality to water deficit at different growth stages," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 152-162.
    5. Li, Bo & Wim, Voogt & Shukla, Manoj Kumar & Du, Taisheng, 2021. "Drip irrigation provides a trade-off between yield and nutritional quality of tomato in the solar greenhouse," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    6. Lu, Jia & Shao, Guangcheng & Gao, Yang & Zhang, Kun & Wei, Qun & Cheng, Jifan, 2021. "Effects of water deficit combined with soil texture, soil bulk density and tomato variety on tomato fruit quality: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    7. Lu, Jia & Shao, Guangcheng & Cui, Jintao & Wang, Xiaojun & Keabetswe, Larona, 2019. "Yield, fruit quality and water use efficiency of tomato for processing under regulated deficit irrigation: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 301-312.
    8. Guo, Lijie & Cao, Hongxia & Helgason, Warren D. & Yang, Hui & Wu, Xuanyi & Li, Hongzheng, 2022. "Effect of drip-line layout and irrigation amount on yield, irrigation water use efficiency, and quality of short-season tomato in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    9. Zhou, Huiping & Chen, Jinliang & Wang, Feng & Li, Xiaojuan & Génard, Michel & Kang, Shaozhong, 2020. "An integrated irrigation strategy for water-saving and quality-improving of cash crops: Theory and practice in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    10. Kuşçu, Hayrettin & Turhan, Ahmet & Demir, Ali Osman, 2014. "The response of processing tomato to deficit irrigation at various phenological stages in a sub-humid environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 92-103.
    11. Zheng, Jianhua & Huang, Guanhua & Jia, Dongdong & Wang, Jun & Mota, Mariana & Pereira, Luis S. & Huang, Quanzhong & Xu, Xu & Liu, Haijun, 2013. "Responses of drip irrigated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) yield, quality and water productivity to various soil matric potential thresholds in an arid region of Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 181-193.
    12. Cantore, V. & Lechkar, O. & Karabulut, E. & Sellami, M.H. & Albrizio, R. & Boari, F. & Stellacci, A.M. & Todorovic, M., 2016. "Combined effect of deficit irrigation and strobilurin application on yield, fruit quality and water use efficiency of “cherry” tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 53-61.
    13. Baoying Shan & Ping Guo & Shanshan Guo & Zhong Li, 2019. "A Price-Forecast-Based Irrigation Scheduling Optimization Model under the Response of Fruit Quality and Price to Water," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Li, Hao & Hou, Xuemin & Bertin, Nadia & Ding, Risheng & Du, Taisheng, 2023. "Quantitative responses of tomato yield, fruit quality and water use efficiency to soil salinity under different water regimes in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    15. Li, Huanhuan & Liu, Hao & Gong, Xuewen & Li, Shuang & Pang, Jie & Chen, Zhifang & Sun, Jingsheng, 2021. "Optimizing irrigation and nitrogen management strategy to trade off yield, crop water productivity, nitrogen use efficiency and fruit quality of greenhouse grown tomato," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    16. Liu, Hao & Li, Huanhuan & Ning, Huifeng & Zhang, Xiaoxian & Li, Shuang & Pang, Jie & Wang, Guangshuai & Sun, Jingsheng, 2019. "Optimizing irrigation frequency and amount to balance yield, fruit quality and water use efficiency of greenhouse tomato," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    17. Jeet Chand & Guna Hewa & Ali Hassanli & Baden Myers, 2020. "Evaluation of Deficit Irrigation and Water Quality on Production and Water Productivity of Tomato in Greenhouse," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Yang, Xin & Zhang, Peng & Wei, Zhenhua & Liu, Jie & Hu, Xiaotao & Liu, Fulai, 2020. "Effects of CO2 fertilization on tomato fruit quality under reduced irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    19. Gong, Xuewen & Qiu, Rangjian & Sun, Jingsheng & Ge, Jiankun & Li, Yanbin & Wang, Shunsheng, 2020. "Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of tomato grown in a solar greenhouse under full and deficit irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Melton, F. & Johnson, L. & Wang, T. & López-Urrea, R. & Cancela, J.J. & Allen, R.G., 2020. "Prediction of crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Background and validation using ground and remote sensing data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:146:y:2014:i:c:p:131-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.