IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/accfor/v33y2009i4p280-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections on the practice of research

Author

Listed:
  • Young, Joni J.
  • Oakes, Leslie S.

Abstract

In this essay, we consider the relevance of research. To support our argument of its relevance, we offer three cases – Hull House, the Indian Trust Fund, and accounting standard-setting – that examine the taken-for-grantedness of accountability and the ways in which the term is frequently used.

Suggested Citation

  • Young, Joni J. & Oakes, Leslie S., 2009. "Reflections on the practice of research," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 280-284.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:accfor:v:33:y:2009:i:4:p:280-284
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2009.01.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0155998209000040
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accfor.2009.01.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shearer, Teri, 2002. "Ethics and accountability: from the for-itself to the for-the-other," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 541-573, August.
    2. Leslie S. Oakes & Joni J. Young, 2008. "Accountability re‐examined: evidence from Hull House," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(6), pages 765-790, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parker, Lee D., 2014. "Corporate social accountability through action: Contemporary insights from British industrial pioneers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 632-659.
    2. Lehman, Glen, 2013. "Critical reflections on Laughlin's middle range research approach: Language not mysterious?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 211-224.
    3. Saravanamuthu, Kala & Lehman, Cheryl, 2013. "Enhancing stakeholder interaction through environmental risk accounts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 410-437.
    4. Iyoha, F.O. & Oyerinde, D., 2010. "Accounting infrastructure and accountability in the management of public expenditure in developing countries: A focus on Nigeria," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 361-373.
    5. Gaffikin, Michael, 2009. "Twenty-one years of critical resistance—almost: A reflection," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 268-273.
    6. Murat Çolak & Melce Elegel, 2020. "Human Resources Practices in Effective Corporate Governance Approach," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 223237-2232, December.
    7. Jeff Everett & Constance Friesen & Dean Neu & Abu Shiraz Rahaman, 2018. "We Have Never Been Secular: Religious Identities, Duties, and Ethics in Audit Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 1121-1142, December.
    8. Roberts, John, 2015. "The ‘subject’ of corruption," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 82-88.
    9. Gibbon, Jane, 2012. "Understandings of accountability: an autoethnographic account using metaphor," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 201-212.
    10. John Francis McKernan & Katarzyna Kosmala, 2007. "Doing the truth: religion – deconstruction – justice, and accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(5), pages 729-764, September.
    11. State Violeta & Tănase Loredana Cristina & Petre Raluca-Georgiana, 2019. "Study Regarding the Respect of Professional Ethics and Deontology in the Promotion of Accounting Services in Romania," Valahian Journal of Economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 89-98, July.
    12. Everett, Jeff, 2008. "Editorial proximity equals publication success: A function of rational self-interest or good-faith economy?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(8), pages 1149-1176.
    13. Graham, Cameron & Grisard, Claudine, 2019. "Rich man, poor man, beggar man, thief: Accounting and the stigma of poverty," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 32-51.
    14. Vassili Joannides, 2012. "Accounterability and the problematics of accountability," Post-Print hal-00676561, HAL.
    15. Young, Joni J. & Annisette, Marcia, 2009. "Cultivating imagination: Ethics, education and literature," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 93-109.
    16. Yu, Ai, 2021. "Accountability as mourning: Accounting for death in the time of COVID-19," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Williams, Paul F. & Jenkins, J. Gregory & Ingraham, Laura, 2006. "The winnowing away of behavioral accounting research in the US: The process for anointing academic elites," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 783-818, November.
    18. Mark Shenkin & Andrea B. Coulson, 2007. "Accountability through activism: learning from Bourdieu," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(2), pages 297-317, April.
    19. Bayou, Mohamed E. & Reinstein, Alan & Williams, Paul F., 2011. "To tell the truth: A discussion of issues concerning truth and ethics in accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 109-124, February.
    20. Dewi, Miranti Kartika & Manochin, Melina & Belal, Ataur, 2021. "Towards a conceptual framework of beneficiary accountability by NGOs: An Indonesian case study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:accfor:v:33:y:2009:i:4:p:280-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/accounting-forum .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.