IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2022-06-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Green Supply Chain Management Improve Sustainable Performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Firman Rizki

    (Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • Etty Murwaningsari

    (Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.)

  • Yvonne Augustine Sudibyo

    (Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

The process of Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) is widely associated with its contribution to the company's sustainability performance. The GSCM process will also be linked to an integrated system of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) that affects the achievement of sustainability performance. The importance of environmental consciousness from producers to direct their business processes that are beneficial to the environment in the long term. This study used 507 samples of manufacturing companies in Indonesia. Data was obtained by giving questionnaires to middle-up managers in departments related to the GSCM process. GSCM and ERP affect the Company's Sustainability Performance. Moderation of environmental consciousness strengthens the influence of GSCM on sustainability performance. GSCM, ERP, and environmental consciousness simultaneously affects sustainability performance by 90.3%. This research provides a new measurement in the form of 5 indicators in the GSCM and 5 indicators for sustainability performance. In this research doesn t discuss about explain bottleneck and risk in GSCM implementation such as regulation about logistic and distribution. This paper can be a guide for practitioners in the supply chain field to use GSCM measurement indicators to be applied in companies, which aim to achieve sustainable performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Firman Rizki & Etty Murwaningsari & Yvonne Augustine Sudibyo, 2022. "Does Green Supply Chain Management Improve Sustainable Performance?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(6), pages 323-331, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2022-06-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/13648/7027
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/13648
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:thr:techub:10028:y:2022:i:1:p:389-407 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Adam Firman Rizki & Yvonne Augustine, 2022. "Green supply chain management practices: direct effects sustainability performance," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 28(1), pages 389-407, February.
    3. Fan‐Hua Kung & Cheng‐Li Huang & Chia‐Ling Cheng, 2012. "Assessing the green value chain to improve environmental performance," International Journal of Development Issues, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 111-128, June.
    4. Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph & Lai, Kee-hung, 2008. "Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 261-273, February.
    5. Stuart L. Hart & Gautam Ahuja, 1996. "Does It Pay To Be Green? An Empirical Examination Of The Relationship Between Emission Reduction And Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 30-37, March.
    6. Ruifeng Gong & Jian Xue & Laijun Zhao & Oleksandra Zolotova & Xiaoqing Ji & Yan Xu, 2019. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Based on the Web of Science (WOS) Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Felipe Fehlberg Herrmann & Ana Paula Barbosa-Povoa & Maria Angela Butturi & Simona Marinelli & Miguel Afonso Sellitto, 2021. "Green Supply Chain Management: Conceptual Framework and Models for Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Geng, Ruoqi & Mansouri, S. Afshin & Aktas, Emel, 2017. "The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 245-258.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panagiotis Trivellas & Georgios Malindretos & Panagiotis Reklitis, 2020. "Implications of Green Logistics Management on Sustainable Business and Supply Chain Performance: Evidence from a Survey in the Greek Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Amer Saeed & Yun Jun & Saviour Ayertey Nubuor & Hewawasam Puwakpitiyage Rasika Priyankara & Mahabaduge Prasad Fernando Jayasuriya, 2018. "Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Changchun Zhu & Jianguo Du & Fakhar Shahzad & Muhammad Umair Wattoo, 2022. "Environment Sustainability Is a Corporate Social Responsibility: Measuring the Nexus between Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Big Data Analytics Capabilities, and Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Heinz Holling & Leonie Backhaus, 2023. "A Meta-Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Muwen Wang & Kecheng Zhang, 2022. "Improving Agricultural Green Supply Chain Management by a Novel Integrated Fuzzy-Delphi and Grey-WINGS Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Samad, Sarminah & Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Almulihi, Ahmed & Alrizq, Mesfer & Alghamdi, Abdullah & Mohd, Saidatulakmal & Ahmadi, Hossein & Syed Azhar, Sharifah Nurlaili Farhana, 2021. "Green Supply Chain Management practices and impact on firm performance: The moderating effect of collaborative capability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Mohammed Taj Hejazi & Bader Al Batati & Ahmed Bahurmuz, 2023. "The Influence of Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Corporate Sustainability Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Xiaoli Guo & Weili Xia & Taiwen Feng & Hongyan Sheng, 2022. "Sustainable supply chain finance adoption and firm performance: Is green supply chain integration a missing link?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1135-1154, October.
    9. Maria Jell‐Ojobor & Aveed Raha, 2022. "Being good at being good—The mediating role of an environmental management system in value‐creating green supply chain management practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1964-1984, July.
    10. Mengying Feng & Wantao Yu & Xingyu Wang & Chee Yew Wong & Maozeng Xu & Zhi Xiao, 2018. "Green supply chain management and financial performance: The mediating roles of operational and environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 811-824, November.
    11. Liu, Junjun & Hu, Houbao & Tong, Xun & Zhu, Qinghua, 2020. "Behavioral and technical perspectives of green supply chain management practices: Empirical evidence from an emerging market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    12. Mayank JAIN, 2023. "Green Image and Incentives: Unraveling Their Moderating Impact on Green Innovations, Investor Perception and Financial Performance," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 4(6), pages 47-59, June.
    13. Esfahbodi, Ali & Zhang, Yufeng & Liu, Yang & Geng, Duanyang, 2023. "The fallacy of profitable green supply chains: The role of green information systems (GIS) in attenuating the sustainability trade-offs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    14. Luísa Pinto, 2020. "Green supply chain practices and company performance in Portuguese manufacturing sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1832-1849, July.
    15. Lekan Damilola Ojo & Onaopepo Adeniyi & Olajide Emmanuel Ogundimu & Olasunkanmi Ososanmi Alaba, 2022. "Rethinking Green Supply Chain Management Practices Impact on Company Performance: A Close-Up Insight," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Manjit Kour & Rajinder Kaur & Arshan Bhullar & Ritika Chaudhary, 2020. "Impact of Green Practices on the Financial Performance: A Study of Indian Automobile Companies," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 220-226.
    17. Christina W.Y. Wong & Chee Yew Wong & Sakun Boon‐itt, 2018. "How Does Sustainable Development of Supply Chains Make Firms Lean, Green and Profitable? A Resource Orchestration Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 375-388, March.
    18. Jing Li & Da Yan, 2021. "Exploration on the Mechanism of the Impact of Green Supply Chain Management on Enterprise Sustainable Development Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Bikram Jit Singh Mann & Harmeet Kaur, 2020. "Sustainable Supply Chain Activities and Financial Performance: An Indian Experience," Vision, , vol. 24(1), pages 60-69, March.
    20. Chieh-Yu Lin & Syed Shah Alam & Yi-Hui Ho & Mohammed Emad Al-Shaikh & Parves Sultan, 2020. "Adoption of Green Supply Chain Management among SMEs in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Green Supply Chain Management; Enterprise Resource Planning; Environmental Consciousness; Sustainability Performance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2022-06-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.