IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-17-00566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio allocation in actively managed funds

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Herzel

    (University of Tor Vergata)

  • Marco Nicolosi

    (University of Perugia)

Abstract

We consider the problem of an investor who allocates his wealth among a risky asset and a managed portfolio. We obtain the optimal strategies of the fund managers for two different incentive schemes. We discuss an example of comparison of the efficient frontiers for the investor, in a model with mean reverting returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Herzel & Marco Nicolosi, 2017. "Portfolio allocation in actively managed funds," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(3), pages 1688-1693.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-17-00566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2017/Volume37/EB-17-V37-I3-P154.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wachter, Jessica A., 2002. "Portfolio and Consumption Decisions under Mean-Reverting Returns: An Exact Solution for Complete Markets," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 63-91, March.
    2. Chevalier, Judith & Ellison, Glenn, 1997. "Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 105(6), pages 1167-1200, December.
    3. Cox, John C. & Huang, Chi-fu, 1989. "Optimal consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices follow a diffusion process," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 33-83, October.
    4. Marco Nicolosi & Flavio Angelini & Stefano Herzel, 2018. "Portfolio management with benchmark related incentives under mean reverting processes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 266(1), pages 373-394, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Nicolosi, 2018. "Optimal strategy for a fund manager with option compensation," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 41(1), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheng, Jiliang & Xu, Si & An, Yunbi & Yang, Jun, 2021. "Dynamic portfolio strategy by loss-averse fund managers facing performance-induced fund flows," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Flavio Angelini & Katia Colaneri & Stefano Herzel & Marco Nicolosi, 2021. "Implicit incentives for fund managers with partial information," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 539-561, October.
    3. Katia Colaneri & Stefano Herzel & Marco Nicolosi, 2021. "The value of knowing the market price of risk," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 101-131, April.
    4. Marco Nicolosi & Flavio Angelini & Stefano Herzel, 2018. "Portfolio management with benchmark related incentives under mean reverting processes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 266(1), pages 373-394, July.
    5. Munk, Claus & Sorensen, Carsten, 2004. "Optimal consumption and investment strategies with stochastic interest rates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 1987-2013, August.
    6. Cvitanic, Jaksa & Lazrak, Ali & Wang, Tan, 2008. "Implications of the Sharpe ratio as a performance measure in multi-period settings," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 1622-1649, May.
    7. Servaas van Bilsen & Roger J. A. Laeven & Theo E. Nijman, 2020. "Consumption and Portfolio Choice Under Loss Aversion and Endogenous Updating of the Reference Level," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 3927-3955, September.
    8. Zhen Shi & Bas J.M. Werker, 2011. "Economic Costs and Benefits of Imposing Short-Horizon Value-at-Risk Type Regulation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-053/2/DSF17, Tinbergen Institute.
    9. Michael W. Brandt & Amit Goyal & Pedro Santa-Clara & Jonathan R. Stroud, 2005. "A Simulation Approach to Dynamic Portfolio Choice with an Application to Learning About Return Predictability," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 831-873.
    10. Castañeda, Pablo & Reus, Lorenzo, 2019. "Suboptimal investment behavior and welfare costs: A simulation based approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 170-180.
    11. Bilel Jarraya & Abdelfettah Bouri, 2013. "A Theoretical Assessment on Optimal Asset Allocations in Insurance Industry," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 2(4), pages 30-44, October.
    12. Penaranda, Francisco, 2007. "Portfolio choice beyond the traditional approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24481, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Matoussi, Anis & Xing, Hao, 2018. "Convex duality for Epstein-Zin stochastic differential utility," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 82519, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. John H. Cochrane, 2014. "A Mean-Variance Benchmark for Intertemporal Portfolio Theory," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(1), pages 1-49, February.
    15. Du Du & Heng-fu Zou, 2008. "Intertemporal Portfolio Choice under Multiple Types of Event Risks," CEMA Working Papers 332, China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics.
    16. Idan Hodor & Andrea Buffa, 2017. "Institutional Investors, Heterogeneous Benchmarks and the Comovement of Asset Prices," 2017 Meeting Papers 374, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    17. Evan Gatev & Stephen A. Ross, 2000. "Rebels, Conformists, Contrarians and Momentum Traders," NBER Working Papers 7835, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Jessica A. Wachter, 2010. "Asset Allocation," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 175-206, December.
    19. Thijs Kamma & Antoon Pelsser, 2019. "Near-Optimal Dynamic Asset Allocation in Financial Markets with Trading Constraints," Papers 1906.12317, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    20. George Chacko & Luis M. Viceira, 2005. "Dynamic Consumption and Portfolio Choice with Stochastic Volatility in Incomplete Markets," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1369-1402.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Portfolio optimization; benchmark related incentives; efficient frontier;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-17-00566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.