This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Credit-Product Interlinkage, Captive Markets and Trade Liberalization in Agriculture: A Theoretical Analysis

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Sarbajit Chaudhuri (Department of Economics, University of Calcutta 56A, B.T. Road, Kolkata - 700 050, India)
Asis Kumar Banerjee (Department of Economics, University of Calcutta 56A, B.T. Road, Kolkata - 700 050, India)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper builds a model of fragmented duopsony in backward agriculture following Basu and Bell (1991) in which the purchasers (traders) have captive markets each but compete in a contested market. We focus on the formation of captive markets through trader-farmer interlinkage in the form of interlinked credit-product contracts (ICPCs). ICPC (or the formation of captive markets) is not an entry-preventive strategy in the model. Its motive is to push the farmers to their reservation income level. However, the captive and the contested markets are linked by the requirement that the reservation income of a captive farmer has to equal the income of a farmer in the contested market. In general, in our model strategic considerations determine the extent of use of ICPCs rather than explaining their existence. In this set-up we examine the effects of trade liberalization in agriculture on the village economy. We show that a reduction in the credit subsidy will raise the size of the captive market, leads to deterioration in the welfare of the farmers and may lower the agricultural productivity of the economy. On the contrary, an increase in the international price of the crop unambiguously improves the welfare of the farmers but the effect on the agricultural productivity is ambiguous. The paper argues that unless the developed countries liberalize trade in their agricultural sector, it would be premature for the developing countries to go in for agricultural trade liberalization and remove all farm subsidies, as this policy may in fact be counterproductive.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics in its journal Indian Economic Review.

Volume (Year): 39 (2004)
Issue (Month): 2 (July)
Pages: 327-348
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:dse:indecr:v:39:y:2004:i:2:p:327-348

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Delhi 110 007
Phone: 91-11-2766-6533/34/35, 2766-6703/04/05
Email:
Web page: http://www.econdse.org/
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:
Web: http://www.ierdse.org/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Pami Dua).

Related research
Keywords: Trader; Farmer; Captive Segment; Contested Segment; Interlinkage; Nash Equilibrium; Trade Liberalization in Agriculture.;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure and Pricing - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
C70 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - General

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by encouraging others to register as authors.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-29.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.