IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/netsci/v6y2018i02p265-280_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulating network intervention strategies: Implications for adoption of behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • BADHAM, JENNIFER
  • KEE, FRANK
  • HUNTER, RUTH F.

Abstract

This study uses simulation over real and artificial networks to compare the eventual adoption outcomes of network interventions, operationalized as idealized contagion processes with different sets of seeds. While the performance depends on the details of both the network and behaviour adoption mechanisms, interventions with seeds that are central to the network are more effective than random selection in the majority of simulations, with faster or more complete adoption throughout the network. These results provide additional theoretical justification for utilizing relevant network information in the design of public health behavior interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Badham, Jennifer & Kee, Frank & Hunter, Ruth F., 2018. "Simulating network intervention strategies: Implications for adoption of behaviour," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 265-280, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:6:y:2018:i:02:p:265-280_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2050124218000048/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McMillan, Cassie & Schaefer, David R., 2021. "Comparing targeting strategies for network-based adolescent drinking interventions: A simulation approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:6:y:2018:i:02:p:265-280_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/nws .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.