IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v21y2001i02p191-212_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Cultural Changes in an Economic Control Agency: The New Zealand Treasury

Author

Listed:
  • WALLIS, JOE
  • DOLLERY, BRIAN

Abstract

A “bureau-shaping model†is adapted to explain how the head of a control agency can shape its culture by agenda-setting, strategic recruitment and engaging staff in “expression games†through which their reputation depends on the impression they develop of competence and commitment to the core beliefs of the agency. The postwar shaping of a “culture of balanced evaluation†at the New Zealand Treasury (NZT) reflected the hegemony of a market failure paradigm. The NZT reinvented itself in the 1980s so that it would be aligned with a reformist advocacy coalition committed to impose and institutionalize a government failure paradigm. The accumulation of a number of threats to the NZT's authority appear to be prompting another reinvention as its current secretary seeks to bring it more into line with the appreciative leadership style of its centre-left government.

Suggested Citation

  • Wallis, Joe & Dollery, Brian, 2001. "Understanding Cultural Changes in an Economic Control Agency: The New Zealand Treasury," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 191-212, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:21:y:2001:i:02:p:191-212_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X01001106/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joe Wallis & Brian Dollery, 2003. "A Comparative Examination of Cultural Change Within the Australian and New Zealand Treasuries," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 27-38, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:21:y:2001:i:02:p:191-212_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.