IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v8y2012i04p511-535_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can capitalism restrain public perceived corruption? Some evidence

Author

Listed:
  • FARIA, HUGO J.
  • MORALES, DANIEL R.
  • PINEDA, NATASHA
  • MONTESINOS, HUGO M.

Abstract

A growing body of evidence documents a vast array of economic and social ill-effects of public perceived corruption. These findings and the scant evidence of recent success in the fight against corruption beg the question: how to abate it? We document the existence of a negative, statistically significant and quantitatively large impact of economic freedom (our proxy for institutions of capitalism, markets and competition) on public corruption. This negative response of corruption to economic freedom holds after allowing for non-linearities interacting economic freedom and political rights, endowments, legal families, ethnicity and for robust determinants of corruption uncovered by Daniel Treisman [‘What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption From Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research?’, Annual Review of Political Science, 10: 211–244], such as income, democracy, freedom of the press and fuel exports. Thus, this paper helps to explain why high-income prosperous countries exhibit low levels of public perceived corruption, and why honesty is a normal good.

Suggested Citation

  • Faria, Hugo J. & Morales, Daniel R. & Pineda, Natasha & Montesinos, Hugo M., 2012. "Can capitalism restrain public perceived corruption? Some evidence," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(4), pages 511-535, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:8:y:2012:i:04:p:511-535_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137412000070/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pierre Cahuc & Yann Algan, 2009. "Civic Virtue and Labor Market Institutions," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(1), pages 111-145, January.
    2. Pellegrini Lorenzo & Luca Tasciotti, 2019. "Corruption: Public and Private," Working Papers 220, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
    3. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8812 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Pierre Cahuc & Yann Algan, 2009. "Civic Virtue and Labor Market Institutions," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(1), pages 111-145, January.
    5. Dincer, Oguzhan & Gunalp, Burak, 2020. "The effects of federal regulations on corruption in U.S. States," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:8:y:2012:i:04:p:511-535_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.