IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v16y2020i6p785-808_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural roots of family ties

Author

Listed:
  • Davis, Lewis S.
  • Williamson, Claudia R.

Abstract

We forward the hypothesis and empirically establish that variations in the strength of family ties are rooted in culture. In particular, we show that individualism is associated with looser family ties. We exploit the associations between contemporary individualism and historical climatic and disease environments to establish a causal relationship. At both the individual- and country-levels, we find strong support that individualism reduces family ties. The estimated effects are economically large and robust to a wide variety of potentially confounding variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Davis, Lewis S. & Williamson, Claudia R., 2020. "Cultural roots of family ties," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(6), pages 785-808, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:16:y:2020:i:6:p:785-808_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137420000211/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davis, Lewis S. & Williamson, Claudia R., 2022. "Individualism and women's economic rights," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 579-597.
    2. Christophe J. Godlewski & Hong Nhung Le, 2024. "Family ties and firm performance empirical evidence from East Asia," Post-Print hal-04435944, HAL.
    3. Claudia Williamson Kramer, 2023. "Individualism and racial tolerance," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 197(3), pages 347-370, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:16:y:2020:i:6:p:785-808_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.