IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v6y1974i01p139-142_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dual of a Cost Minimizing Linear Transshipment Model: An Economic Interpretation of an Assembly-Plant Processing-Distribution Network for a Firm

Author

Listed:
  • Holroyd, William. M.

Abstract

The general economic meanings and mathematical structure of the dual of a primal mathematical programming model have been discussed for many years. However, within the mathematical programming realm, many interesting formulization variations have developed partly in response to variations in particulars of problems.A number of authors have discussed the economic meaning and mathematical structure of the primal of a linear cost minimizing transportation model. Some authors discussed the economic meaning and mathematical structure of the dual as well as the primal of the transportation model. Several authors discussed cost minimizing transshipment models. Recently, greater interest has been shown in specific economic meanings of the dual of the cost minimizing transshipment model.

Suggested Citation

  • Holroyd, William. M., 1974. "The Dual of a Cost Minimizing Linear Transshipment Model: An Economic Interpretation of an Assembly-Plant Processing-Distribution Network for a Firm," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 139-142, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:6:y:1974:i:01:p:139-142_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0081305200011638/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fuller, Stephen W. & Shanmugham, Chiyyarath V., 1978. "Network Flow Models: Use In Rural Freight Transportation Analysis And A Comparison With Linear Programming," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-6, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:6:y:1974:i:01:p:139-142_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.