IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v8y1954i2p274-280_17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Council of Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Anonymous

Abstract

The third part of the fifth ordinary session of the Consultative Assembly of the Council of Europe was held in Strasbourg from September 15 through 26, 1953.The future position of the Saar: After considerable debate, the Consultative Assembly adopted a resolution submitted by Mr. van der Goes van Naters (Netherlands, Labor) on the future position of the Saar. In submitting a report on this question from the Committee on General Affairs, the rapporteur (van Naters) stressed the importance of finding a solution to the Saar question since the dispute between France and the German Federal Republic threatened to impede if not prevent progress toward European integration and cooperation. He emphasized that the problem was of concern to the whole of Europe and should be solved as a European problem rather than as a matter of concern only to Germans and French. During the debate, support of the van Naters' proposal came from representatives of the Saar, from Mr. Eugen Gerstenmaier (German Federal Republic, Christian Democratic Union), and Mr. Julian Amery (United Kingdom, Conservative). Mr. Amery, while unable to commit his government, announced his belief that the United Kingdom would not shirk its duties in this matter although unable to agree in advance to a particular time-table of action or to be bound to a particular procedure. Mr. Karl Mommer (German Federal Republic, Social-Democrat Party, SPD) felt that the question of the Saar was part of the larger problem of the reunification of Germany; the Saar, he argued, had not ceased to be a part of Germany.

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous, 1954. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 274-280, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:8:y:1954:i:2:p:274-280_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002081830003071X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vögtle, Eva Maria, 2010. "Beyond Bologna: The Bologna process as a global template for higher education reform efforts," TranState Working Papers 129, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    2. Kortum, Samuel & Lerner, Josh, 1998. "Stronger protection or technological revolution: what is behind the recent surge in patenting?," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 247-304, June.
    3. Romina D’Ascanio & Lorenzo Barbieri & Giorgia De Pasquale & Andrea Filpa & Anna Laura Palazzo, 2021. "Landscape Works. Balancing Nature and Culture in the Pantelleria National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Dumitriu, Ramona & Stefanescu, Răzvan, 2016. "Strategic decisions on industrialization: case of Galati Steel Works," MPRA Paper 89007, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2016.
    5. Joseph Rikhof & Ashley Geerts, 2019. "Protected Groups in Refugee Law and International Law," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-47, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:8:y:1954:i:2:p:274-280_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.