IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v8y1954i2p270-273_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

World Health Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Anonymous

Abstract

At its thirteenth session, which was held in Geneva from January 12 to February 2, 1954, the Executive Board of the World Health Organization had some 80 items on its agenda. It examined a) reports on the work of expert and special committees concerned with such subjects as malaria, poliomyelitis, rabies, drugs liable to produce addiction, bioligical standardization, environmental sanitation, alcohol, public-health administration, rheumatic diseases, quarantine measures, and yellow fever; b) progress being made in a number of projects, such as a campaign against smallpox, the selection of international non-proprietary names for drugs, standardization of laboratory tests of foods, and a study on international medical law; and c) a variety of administrative and financial matters, including the Director-General's proposed program and budget estimates for 1955, the scale of assessments for member countries, and the revision of the staff rules proposed by the Director-General. Decisions taken by the Board included a recommendation that the seventh World Health Assembly request the Board at its fifteenth session to continue the study of program analysis and evaluation and report to the eighth Assembly, concurrence in certain transfers proposed by the Director-General between sections of the 1954 appropriation resolution of the sixth Assembly, and recommendations as to the procedure for considering the 1955 program and budget estimates at the seventh Assembly. Noting that the financial problems facing WHO in implementing the 1954 program arose because the known amount of technical assistance funds to be made available to the organization in 1954 fell substantially short of amounts expected and was inadequate to meet the minimum requirements, the Board authorized the Director-General to: continue all projects and activities then in operation, implement those projects not yet started where the government concerned had proceeded to the extent that funds spent or set aside would be lost if the project did not go forward or where the project was an essential element of a program planned in stages which had been agreed with WHO and the government concerned, defer starting new activities wherever possible, and report to the seventh Assembly on further developments.

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous, 1954. "World Health Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 270-273, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:8:y:1954:i:2:p:270-273_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818300030708/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daron Acemoglu & Simon Johnson & James A. Robinson, 2012. "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(6), pages 3077-3110, October.
    2. Grosse, Scott, 1993. "Schistosomiasis And Water Resources Development: A Re-Evaluation Of An Important Environment-Health Linkage," Working Papers 11881, Environmental and Natural Resources Policy Training Project.
    3. John S. Moore, 1993. "‘Jack Fisher's' flu’: a visitation revisited," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 46(2), pages 280-307, May.
    4. Laperrière, Vincent & Brugger, Katharina & Rubel, Franz, 2016. "Cross-scale modeling of a vector-borne disease, from the individual to the metapopulation: The seasonal dynamics of sylvatic plague in Kazakhstan," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 34-48.
    5. Daron Acemoglu & Simon Johnson & James A. Robinson, 2011. "Hither Thou Shalt Come, But No Further: Reply to "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Comment"," NBER Working Papers 16966, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Börner, Lars & Severgnini, Battista, 2011. "Epidemic trade," Discussion Papers 2011/12, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    7. Lena Huldén & Ross McKitrick & Larry Huldén, 2014. "Average household size and the eradication of malaria," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 177(3), pages 725-742, June.
    8. Aue, Luis, 2021. "How Do Metrics Shape Polities? From Analogue to Digital Measurement Regimes in International Health Politics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 83-101.
    9. Elizabeth A. Casman & Baruch Fischhoff, 2008. "Risk Communication Planning for the Aftermath of a Plague Bioattack," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1327-1342, October.
    10. Daron Acemoglu & Simon Johnson, 2007. "Disease and Development: The Effect of Life Expectancy on Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(6), pages 925-985, December.
    11. Tumbe, Chinmay, 2020. "Pandemics and Historical Mortality in India," IIMA Working Papers WP 2020-12-03, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    12. Philip Hauser, 1967. "“Family planning and population programs” a book review article," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 4(1), pages 397-414, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:8:y:1954:i:2:p:270-273_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.