IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v5y2012i01p2-24_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teams Are Changing: Are Research and Practice Evolving Fast Enough?

Author

Listed:
  • Tannenbaum, Scott I.
  • Mathieu, John E.
  • Salas, Eduardo
  • Cohen, Debra

Abstract

In the past, there was a fairly strong alignment between what teams experienced, the topics that team researchers were studying, and the practices that organizations used to manage their teams. However, the nature of teams and the environment in which they operate has changed, and as a result, new needs have emerged. Although there have been some innovative advancements, research and practice have not always adjusted to remain aligned with emerging needs. We highlight 3 significant change themes that are affecting teams: (a) dynamic composition, (b) technology and distance, and (c) empowerment and delayering. For each theme, we share our observations, review the related science and identify future research needs, and specify challenges and recommendations for employing effective team-based practices in applied settings. We conclude with thoughts about the future and suggest that new theories, research methods, and analyses may be needed to study the new team dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Tannenbaum, Scott I. & Mathieu, John E. & Salas, Eduardo & Cohen, Debra, 2012. "Teams Are Changing: Are Research and Practice Evolving Fast Enough?," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 2-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:5:y:2012:i:01:p:2-24_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942600004673/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aramovich, Nicholas P. & Larson, James R., 2013. "Strategic demonstration of problem solutions by groups: The effects of member preferences, confidence, and learning goals," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 36-52.
    2. Gupta, Parul & Prashar, Anupama & Giannakis, Mihalis & Dutot, Vincent & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "How organizational socialization occurring in virtual setting unique: A longitudinal study of socialization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Darío Blanco-Fernández & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2023. "Interactions between the individual and the group level in organizations: The case of learning and group turnover," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1087-1128, December.
    4. Erik R. Eddy & Caroline P. D’Abate & Melinda Costello, 2019. "The Impact of Enhanced Teammate Evaluations on Important Individual and Team Outcomes," Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2), pages 158-158, November.
    5. Rong Liu & Akhil Kumar & Juhnyoung Lee, 2022. "Multi-level Team Assignment in Social Business Processes: An Algorithm and Simulation Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1949-1969, December.
    6. Lionel P. Robert Jr & Alan R. Dennis & Manju K. Ahuja, 2018. "Differences are Different: Examining the Effects of Communication Media on the Impacts of Racial and Gender Diversity in Decision-Making Teams," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 525-545, September.
    7. Dar'io Blanco-Fern'andez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2024. "Interactions between dynamic team composition and coordination: An agent-based modeling approach," Papers 2401.05832, arXiv.org.
    8. Lazarević Snežana & Lukić Jelena, 2018. "Team Learning Processes and Activities in Organization: A Case Study," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 56(3), pages 301-319, September.
    9. Cristina B Gibson & Patrick D Dunlop & John L Cordery, 2019. "Managing formalization to increase global team effectiveness and meaningfulness of work in multinational organizations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(6), pages 1021-1052, August.
    10. Bertolotti, Fabiola & Mattarelli, Elisa & Vignoli, Matteo & Macrì, Diego Maria, 2015. "Exploring the relationship between multiple team membership and team performance: The role of social networks and collaborative technology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 911-924.
    11. Mohammed, Susan & Harrison, David A., 2013. "The clocks that time us are not the same: A theory of temporal diversity, task characteristics, and performance in teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 244-256.
    12. Dario Blanco-Fernandez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2022. "Interactions between the individual and the group level in organizations: The case of learning and autonomous group adaptation," Papers 2203.09162, arXiv.org.
    13. Fien Mertens & Anneleen De Gendt & Myriam Deveugele & Ann Van Hecke & Peter Pype, 2019. "Interprofessional collaboration within fluid teams: Community nurses' experiences with palliative home care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3680-3690, October.
    14. Dar'io Blanco-Fern'andez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2022. "Dynamic groups in complex task environments: To change or not to change a winning team?," Papers 2203.09157, arXiv.org.
    15. Bata P. P. & Norman A. & Allen D., 2021. "Information Sharing Behaviour of Complex and Extended Organisations," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(11), pages 1-41, July.
    16. Arsev Umur Aydinoglu, 2013. "Toward a New Understanding of Virtual Research Collaborations," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    17. Meng Lv & Shaohong Feng, 2021. "Temporary teams: current research focus and future directions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:5:y:2012:i:01:p:2-24_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.