IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v10y2015i03p357-360_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance management: the clinician’s tale

Author

Listed:
  • Smith, Peter C.

Abstract

The success of performance management in health care depends crucially on the response of health care professionals to the various instruments of performance management (PM). Yet we know little about how those professionals think and work. They may ignore PM for three reasons: ignorance of the relevant performance information; lack of faith in the credibility of the information; or inability to take relevant action. Furthermore, there is a risk that PM comes into fundamental conflict with the idea of professional autonomy and personalization of care. In order to create more effective PM policies, we need to know much more about professional motivations and constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith, Peter C., 2015. "Performance management: the clinician’s tale," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 357-360, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:10:y:2015:i:03:p:357-360_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133114000474/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Mariani & Marco Tieghi & Sabrina Gigli, 2016. "The efficacy of performance management system in healthcare. A literature review and research perspectives," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(3), pages 97-116.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:10:y:2015:i:03:p:357-360_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.