IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v15y2009i02p367-459_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Actuarial Aspects of Internal Models for Solvency II

Author

Listed:
  • Brooks, D.
  • Care, R. J.
  • Chaplin, M. B.
  • Kaufman, A. M.
  • Morgan, K. A.
  • Roberts, D. N.
  • Skinner, J. M. E.
  • Huntington-Thresher, D. J. K.
  • Tuley, P. J.
  • Wong, D. L.

Abstract

The draft paper sets out the authors' views of what good practice for the actuarial aspects of internal models will look like in 2012, the year Solvency II is expected to be implemented. Actuaries working on internal models can expect to have to follow such practices if their internal models are to be approved for use in calculating regulatory capital. The paper is therefore relevant for actuaries who plan to work on internal model implementation for Solvency II. Moreover, the risk quantification techniques discussed in the paper can also be used in the Own Risk Solvency Assessment (ORSA) process also required by Solvency II. The paper is therefore relevant to actuaries working in companies that are not planning to apply to use an internal model. The paper covers both life and non-life insurance and reinsurance, and reviews current practice as well as setting out possible future practice. This leads to identification of areas for research by the Profession to prepare for 2012 and an indication of the directions this work might take. The paper is effectively a work in progress, and readers should ask themselves what they should do in response to the ideas discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Brooks, D. & Care, R. J. & Chaplin, M. B. & Kaufman, A. M. & Morgan, K. A. & Roberts, D. N. & Skinner, J. M. E. & Huntington-Thresher, D. J. K. & Tuley, P. J. & Wong, D. L., 2009. "Actuarial Aspects of Internal Models for Solvency II," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 367-459, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:15:y:2009:i:02:p:367-459_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321700005699/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang, Xi & Reiner, David & Li, Jia, 2011. "Perceptions of opinion leaders towards CCS demonstration projects in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1873-1885, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:15:y:2009:i:02:p:367-459_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.