Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The Paradox of Educational Fairness in China

Contents:

Author Info

  • Wanhua Peng

    (Shihezi University
    Graduate School, Peking University)

  • Xiaobin Peng

    (Office of Informatization, Peking University)

  • Kaiping Peng

    (Department of Psychology, University of California
    Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University)

Abstract

Neoclassical economics is founded on a narrow notion of the rational human being, with self-interest and material well-being as the basis of judgment and decision making. This stands in stark contrast to long held views, in philosophy and psychology, that maintain that human reason is motivated in part by emotions and, in particular, by social comparison. The social psychologist Festinger found that much judgment and decision making are the results of social comparison which may or may not reflect the actual reality of individuals. We tested Festinger¡¯s notion in Chinese cultural contexts by investigating public discussions of educational fairness. We found that while educational spending has been increasing steadily, sentiments about educational fairness have been deteriorating. Time series analysis shows that these phenomena were not due to price inflation, availability of opinion outlets, or regional difference, but to the psychological process of social comparison. The implications of such a paradox are discussed.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.aeconf.net/Articles/May2009/aef100109.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: http://down.aefweb.net/AefArticles/aef100109.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Society for AEF in its journal Annals of Economics and Finance.

Volume (Year): 10 (2009)
Issue (Month): 1 (May)
Pages: 199-213

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2009:v:10:i:1:p:199-213

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.aeconf.net/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Educational spending; Educational fairness; Social comparison; Paradox;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Yubo Hou & Ge Gao & Fei Wang & Tingrui Li & Zhilan Yu, 2011. "Organizational Commitment and Creativity: the Influence of Thinking Styles," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, Society for AEF, vol. 12(2), pages 411-431, November.
  2. Wanhua Peng & Kaiping Peng, 2010. "Ethnic Stereotypes and Economic Discrepancy: The Illusion of Differences between Han and Uyghur Chinese," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, Society for AEF, vol. 11(2), pages 381-397, November.
  3. repec:cuf:journl:y:2013:v:14:i:1:n:5:yang is not listed on IDEAS
  4. Qian Yang & Kaiping Peng & Xueya Zhou & Ruoqiao Zheng & Wanhua Peng, 2013. "The Monetary Effect of Power: How Perception of Power Affects Monetary Value Judgments in China and US," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, Society for AEF, vol. 14(1), pages 69-83, May.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2009:v:10:i:1:p:199-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Qiang Gao).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.