IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cub/journm/v15y2020i2p28-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Priorities when looking for servitization in the mechanical engineering industry

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Großpötzl

    (Upper Austria University of Applied Sciences, Steyr, Austria)

  • Ulrich Seiler

    (Upper Austria University of Applied Sciences, Steyr, Austria)

  • Margarethe Überwimmer

    (Upper Austria University of Applied Sciences, Steyr, Austria)

Abstract

The necessity of a holistic framework for servitization and the discussion and classification of the associated measures for the development of a servitization strategy to expand the business areas in mechanical engineering is implicit. This is particularly relevant as servitization must take into account both business models (BM) and organizational change. This paper, therefore, sets out to investigate crucial measures, to implement a servitization strategy, ranked by their importance of implementation. The design of the research is twofold, consisting of a data gathering and data analysis step. While the first-mentioned was carried out through systematic literature research, the second part focused on analysing gathered information, including ranking the conclusions drawn. This was achieved through the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). AHP is one of the most comprehensive frameworks that is seen as decision making for several criteria. The method makes it possible to consider the problem both quantitatively and qualitatively. This p+aper suggests that at the beginning of the process of servitization, the focus has to be set on a major change in the mindset of the workforce and the organizational culture to succeed with the servitization model. Besides, significant investments must be made in infrastructure and resources to enable services at all. Defining the services offered is of mediocre importance. Adapting existing processes away from a product-centric view towards a service-oriented view is, in this case, indispensable, but not of the highest relevance. Evidently, the evaluation of services is of less importance during the implementation of servitization. Since the paper is primarily based on literature research and subsequent analytical comparison through the AHP, further research is necessary to extend and validate the framework and measures found. The paper tackles a business problem which importance will continue to increase in the next years, as there will be a need to develop existing strategies towards more service-centric business models: Differentiating oneself from competition and expanding the range of services and products contributes significantly to the long-term survival of companies which is driven by growth and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Großpötzl & Ulrich Seiler & Margarethe Überwimmer, 2020. "Priorities when looking for servitization in the mechanical engineering industry," Marketing Science & Inspirations, Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Management, vol. 15(2), pages 28-39.
  • Handle: RePEc:cub:journm:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:28-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://msijournal.com/priorities-when-looking-for-servitization-in-the-mechanical-engineering-industry/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    service science; implementation; servitization; priority; AHP; business model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cub:journm:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:28-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Frantisek Olsavsky (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkomsk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.