IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v35y2009i1p41-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Regulation of Poll Reporting in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Tania Gosselin
  • François Pétry

Abstract

The Canada Elections Act of 2000 regulates how the media must disclose the technical information regarding election polls. But the media coverage of non-election polls remains self-regulated. We examine how the technical information regarding election and non-election polling is reported in stories published by La Presse , the Globe and Mail , and the Calgary Herald . Our results show that, although media disclosure falls well short of the polling industry's standards, the technical information surrounding non-election polls is at least as complete as the information accompanying election polls. Long articles about polls sponsored by the media that publish them provide significantly more methodological information than short articles in which polls sponsored by "outside" organizations are mentioned in passing. These findings indicate that poll-reporting routines are relatively impervious to standards and rules regulating how poll results should be communicated to the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Tania Gosselin & François Pétry, 2009. "The Regulation of Poll Reporting in Canada," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 35(1), pages 41-57, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:35:y:2009:i:1:p:41-57
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.35.1.41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.35.1.41
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.35.1.41?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claire Durand, 2003. "Reply/Réponse The New Act Has Merit if Enforced ­ Exactly What I Said," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 29(3), pages 373-375, September.
    2. Peter A. Ferguson & Christine De Clercy, 2005. "Regulatory Compliance in Opinion Poll Reporting During the 2004 Canadian Election," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 31(3), pages 243-258, September.
    3. Cristine de Clercy & Peter A. Ferguson, 2003. "Comment/Commentaire The 2000 Election and the New Elections Act Poll Reporting Provisions: Contra Professor Durand, the Law Has Merit," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 29(3), pages 367-371, September.
    4. Claire Durand, 2002. "The 2000 Canadian Election and Poll Reporting under the New Elections Act," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 28(4), pages 539-545, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:35:y:2009:i:1:p:41-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.