This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The 2000 Canadian Election and Poll Reporting under the New Elections Act

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Claire Durand
Abstract

Just before the 2000 Canadian electoral campaign, a new law was passed regulating the publication of polls in the media during electoral campaigns. The law required newspapers to publish basic information about the way the polls they presented were conducted, and the wording of questions and the means by which a methodological report could be obtained. In addition, the law specified which information the methodological report must contain. This article examines the extent to which the law was complied with. The research shows that the first two points were not problematic, though sometimes the information was not easily available. However, methodological reports did not generally provide all the requested information. In particular, crucial information such as response rates, refusal rates and the sampling method used were rarely provided. It would also appear that compliance with the law was not verified. Elections Canada relied on the public to issue complaints, and the media relied on pollsters to provide the information. The study concludes first, that ambiguities in the Act concerning exactly what information is required should be clarified; second, that methodological information should be placed together in a separate and identified subsection, as was the case with most media reports; and third, that Elections Canada should provide a model of the detailed report (326-3) so that the media and pollsters all present the information in a standard, easy-to-compare fashion.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://economics.ca/cgi/jab?journal=cpp&view=v28n4/CPPv28n4p539.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: No access restriction except for the four most recent issues.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by University of Toronto Press in its journal Canadian Public Policy.

Volume (Year): 28 (2002)
Issue (Month): 4 (December)
Pages: 539-545
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:28:y:2002:i:4:p:539-545

Contact details of provider:
Postal: University of Toronto Press Journals Division 5201 Dufferin Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T8
Email:
Web page: http://economics.ca/cpp/

Order Information:
Email:
Web: http://www.utpjournals.com/cpp/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Prof. Werner Antweiler).

Related research
Keywords:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc stands for Research Papers in Economics.

This page was last updated on 2010-1-4.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.