IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v24y1998is2p73-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning for Sustainable Forests in British Columbia through Land Use Zoning

Author

Listed:
  • Sivaguru Sahajananthan
  • David L. Haley
  • John Nelson

Abstract

Economic theory suggests that managing every hectare of forestland for multiple products, which is occurring in British Columbia, is inefficient. Using a case study for the Revelstoke area of the province, we demonstrate that spatially separating commercial timber activities from non-timber ones can lead to higher timber rents, while affording better environmental protection, including protection of critical wildlife habitat. Zoning provides an incentive to invest resources in intensive management in areas dedicated to commercial timber production, while enhancing the flow of other resource values from the unit as a whole. With zoning it is possible to avoid areas where visual and environmental amenity values are particularly sensitive, which is not possible with current, multiple-use management regimes. By focusing timber production, it is possible to reduce the forestland base, required to maintain current levels of harvest, by over 50 percent.

Suggested Citation

  • Sivaguru Sahajananthan & David L. Haley & John Nelson, 1998. "Planning for Sustainable Forests in British Columbia through Land Use Zoning," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 24(s2), pages 73-81, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:24:y:1998:i:s2:p:73-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%28199805%2924%3CS73%3APFSFIB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David L. Haley & Jeanette Leitch, 1992. "The Future of Our Forests - Report of the British Columbia Forest Resources Commission: A Critique," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 18(1), pages 47-56, March.
    2. Jeffrey R. Vincent & Clark S. Binkley, 1993. "Efficient Multiple-Use Forestry May Require Land-Use Specialization," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 69(4), pages 370-376.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krcmar, Emina & Vertinsky, Ilan & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2004. "Modeling Alternative Zoning Strategies In Forest Management," Working Papers 18154, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    2. Steven Globerman & Masao Nakamura & Karen Ruckman & Ilan Vertinsky, 1998. "Innovation, Strategy and Canada's Forest Products Industry," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 24(s2), pages 27-40, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Boscolo, 2000. "Multiple Use Management of Tropical Forests: On the Superiority of Land Use Specialization," CID Working Papers 41, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    2. Jens Abildtrup & Jacques-Alexandre Laye & Maximilien Laye & Anne Stenger, 2012. "Irreversibility and Uncertainty in Multifunctional Forest Management Allocation," Post-Print hal-01072290, HAL.
    3. Alexander S. Mather, 1997. "South-North Challenges in Global Forestry," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1997-145, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Marco Boscolo, 2000. "Multiple Use Management of Tropical Forests: On the Superiority of Land Use Specialization," CID Working Papers 41A, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    5. ERKKI Koskela & MARKKU Ollikainen, 1997. "Optimal Design of Forest Taxation with Multiple-Use Characteristics of Forest Stands," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(1), pages 41-62, July.
    6. Krcmar, Emina & Vertinsky, Ilan & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2004. "Modeling Alternative Zoning Strategies In Forest Management," Working Papers 18154, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    7. Swallow, Stephen K., 1996. "Economic Issues in Ecosystem Management: An Introduction and Overview," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 83-100, October.
    8. Markku Ollikainen & Erkki Koskela, 2001. "Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence," CESifo Working Paper Series 452, CESifo.
    9. M. Ševčík & M. Hájek & A. Mikulková, 2014. "Specifics in the introduction of sustainability reporting by companies in the forestry sector," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(6), pages 226-235.
    10. Tisdell, Clement A., 2012. "Conserving Forest Wildlife and Other Ecosystem Services: Opportunity Costs and The Valuation of Alternative Logging Regimes," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers 126230, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    11. Andersson, Mikael & Sallnas, Ola & Carlsson, Mattias, 2006. "A landscape perspective on differentiated management for production of timber and nature conservation values," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 153-161, November.
    12. Simpson, R. David, 2014. "Ecosystem services as substitute inputs: Basic results and important implications for conservation policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 102-108.
    13. Mark E. Lichtenstein & Claire A. Montgomery, 2003. "Biodiversity and Timber in the Coast Range of Oregon: Inside the Production Possibility Frontier," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 79(1), pages 56-73.
    14. Polasky, Stephen & Costello, Christopher & Solow, Andrew, 2005. "The Economics of Biodiversity," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 29, pages 1517-1560, Elsevier.
    15. Noack, Frederik A.W. & Manthey, Michael & Ruitenbeek, Jack H. & Mohadjer, M.R. Marvie, 2010. "Separate or mixed production of timber, livestock and biodiversity in the Caspian Forest," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 67-76, November.
    16. Tisdell, Clement A., 2011. "Selective logging and the economics of conserving forest wildlife species e.g. orangutans," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers 122725, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    17. Rose, Steven K. & Chapman, Duane, 2003. "Timber harvest adjacency economies, hunting, species protection, and old growth value: seeking the dynamic optimum," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2-3), pages 325-344, March.
    18. Misra, Dinesh & Kant, Shashi, 2004. "Production analysis of collaborative forest management using an example of joint forest management from Gujarat, India," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3-4), pages 301-320, June.
    19. Murray, Brian C. & Abt, Robert C., 2001. "Estimating price compensation requirements for eco-certified forestry," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 149-163, January.
    20. Paletto, Alessandro & Ferretti, Fabrizio & De Meo, Isabella, 2012. "The role of social networks in forest landscape planning," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 132-139.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:24:y:1998:i:s2:p:73-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.