IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000452/016273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoción de la innovación social a través de la utilización de metodologías participativas en la gestión del conocimiento

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Lora L.
  • Daniel Rocha J.

Abstract

El artículo discute el potencial de las metodologías participativas de investigación y planeación social para una gestión participativa del conocimiento y la promoción de la innovación social. En este contexto se retoman metodologías de planeación e investigación participativas implementadas en diversas iniciativas del Parque Científico de Innovación Social de la Universidad Minuto de Dios, entre estas la metodología de marco lógico y las herramientas desarrolladas en el ámbito de la investigación-acción participativa (particularmente, el diagnóstico rural participativo y la cartografía social). Su carácter incluyente y su capacidad de integrar saberes y experiencias de diversos actores sociales e institucionales favorecen la promoción y el desarrollo de estrategias en las cuales los diversos actores sociales de la gestión del conocimiento sean efectivamente incorporados. Estas metodologías son caminos metodológicos clave para la gestión del conocimiento y la formulación colectiva y el desarrollo participativo de iniciativas sociales, por lo que se constituyen cada vez más en materias primas fundamentales para cualquier iniciativa de innovación social.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Lora L. & Daniel Rocha J., 2016. "Promoción de la innovación social a través de la utilización de metodologías participativas en la gestión del conocimiento," Revista Equidad y Desarrollo, Universidad de la Salle, issue 25, pages 159-178, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000452:016273
    DOI: 10.19052/ed.3513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.19052/ed.3513
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19052/ed.3513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoff Mulgan, 2006. "The Process of Social Innovation," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 1(2), pages 145-162, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillermo Domínguez-Fernández & Esther Prieto-Jiménez & Peter Backhouse & Eduardo Ismodes, 2020. "Cybersociety and University Sustainability: The Challenge of Holistic Restructuring in Universities in Chile, Spain, and Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Gianluca Misuraca & Clelia Colombo & Csaba Kucsera & Stephanie Carretero & Margherita Bacigalupo & Raluca Radescu, 2015. "ICT-enabled Social Innovation in support of the Implementation of the Social Investment Package (IESI) - Mapping and Analysis of ICT-enabled Social Innovation Initiatives promoting Social Investment t," JRC Research Reports JRC97467, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Avelino, Flor & Wittmayer, Julia M. & Pel, Bonno & Weaver, Paul & Dumitru, Adina & Haxeltine, Alex & Kemp, René & Jørgensen, Michael S. & Bauler, Tom & Ruijsink, Saskia & O'Riordan, Tim, 2019. "Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 195-206.
    4. Baran Grzegorz, 2020. "Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 36-57, March.
    5. Boeing, Philipp & Wang, Yihan, 2021. "Decoding China's Covid-19 "virus exceptionalism": Community-based digital contact tracing in Wuhan," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-028, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Shr-Wei Kao & Pin Luarn, 2020. "Topic Modeling Analysis of Social Enterprises: Twitter Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    8. Tan, Wee-Liang & Zuckermann, Ghil'ad, 2021. "External impetus, co-production and grassroots innovations: The case of an innovation involving a language," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    9. Gafar ALMHAMAD & Vilmos LAKATOS & Ali ALKERDI & Lama ALKHATIB, 2022. "Social Entrepreneurship Research In The Middle East (Systematic Review)," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 7-15, July.
    10. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Abu Bashar & Nishad Nawaz & Sitara Karim & Mahmood Asad Mohd. Ali & Habeeb Ur Rahiman & Md. Shabbir Alam, 2021. "Exploring the Role of Islamic Fintech in Combating the Aftershocks of COVID-19: The Open Social Innovation of the Islamic Financial System," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Svensson, Per G. & Hambrick, Marion E., 2019. "Exploring how external stakeholders shape social innovation in sport for development and peace," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 540-552.
    12. Chiara Certomà, 2020. "Digital Social Innovation and Urban Space: A Critical Geography Agenda," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 8-19.
    13. Antonio Baselice & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Maurizio Prosperi & Antonio Stasi & Antonio Lopolito, 2021. "Key Drivers of the Engagement of Farmers in Social Innovation for Marginalised Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Szabolcs Nagy & Mariann Veresne Somosi, 2022. "The relationship between social innovation and digital economy and society," Papers 2212.13840, arXiv.org.
    15. Amalia Venera TODORUT & Vassilis TSELENTIS, 2016. "Social Innovation And Social Entrepeneurship - A Solution For The Issues Of The Contemporary Society," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 266-270, November.
    16. Germán Jaraíz Arroyo & Auxiliadora González Portillo, 2020. "Focus on Weaknesses or Strengths? Determining Factors for an Inclusive and Relational Management in Public Community Social Service Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Silvia Stuchi & Sonia Paulino & Faïz Gallouj, 2022. "Social Innovation in Active Mobility Public Services in the Megacity of Sao Paulo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Rahman, Syed Abidur & Taghizadeh, Seyedeh Khadijeh & Ramayah, T. & Alam, Mirza Mohammad Didarul, 2017. "Technology acceptance among micro-entrepreneurs in marginalized social strata: The case of social innovation in Bangladesh," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 236-245.
    19. Maurizio Busacca & Roberto Paladini, 2022. "Creativity and Social Capital: The Pillars of Venice’s Success in the New European Bauhaus Programme," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Carina Veeckman & Laura Temmerman, 2021. "Urban Living Labs and Citizen Science: From Innovation and Science towards Policy Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000452:016273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adriana Otálora Buitrago (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclasco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.