IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v5y2020i4p59-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Social Innovation and the Adoption of #PlanTech: The Case of Coventry City Council

Author

Listed:
  • Ciaran Devlin

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, UK)

Abstract

The smart city trend has generated considerable interest in using digital technology to transform urban planning and governance, and in the UK the government funded Connected Places Catapult has been given the remit of stimulating innovation in cities. One of its focuses is urban planning and technology (#PlanTech) which has garnered attention from the Royal Town Planning Institute, a vast number of the UK local authorities, academia and technology companies. #PlanTech aims to revolutionise the urban planning industry across public, private and not for profit sectors in an era where fiscal austerity has catalysed a drive for using advanced technologies to improve the efficiency of operations and decision making. Technological innovation is being promoted to enable local authorities to deliver services with significantly reduced financial resources while simultaneously creating a modernised and more efficient public sector. Within this context, this article uses a detailed ethnographic study of planning functions in Coventry City Council, UK, to analyse how they have adapted so far in response to both austerity and the drive for digital innovation. The article concludes by examining how #PlanTech and digital social innovation may help deliver the broader smart city strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ciaran Devlin, 2020. "Digital Social Innovation and the Adoption of #PlanTech: The Case of Coventry City Council," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 59-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:5:y:2020:i:4:p:59-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3214
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stan Geertman & John Stillwell, 2003. "Planning Support Systems: An Introduction," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Stan Geertman & John Stillwell (ed.), Planning Support Systems in Practice, chapter 1, pages 3-22, Springer.
    2. Emine Mine Thompson & Paul Greenhalgh & Kevin Muldoon-Smith & James Charlton & Michal Dolník, 2016. "Planners in the Future City: Using City Information Modelling to Support Planners as Market Actors," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(1), pages 79-94.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claire Daniel & Christopher Pettit, 2022. "Charting the past and possible futures of planning support systems: Results of a citation network analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(7), pages 1875-1892, September.
    2. Chiara Certomà & Mark Dyer & Antonella Passani, 2020. "The City of Digital Social Innovators," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 1-7.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. te Brömmelstroet, Marco, 2017. "Towards a pragmatic research agenda for the PSS domain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 77-83.
    2. Pelzer, Peter, 2017. "Usefulness of planning support systems: A conceptual framework and an empirical illustration," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 84-95.
    3. Ge Zhang & Wenwen Zhang & Subhrajit Guhathakurta & Nisha Botchwey, 2019. "Development of a flow-based planning support system based on open data for the City of Atlanta," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(2), pages 207-224, February.
    4. Zhen Liu & Tzuhui Wu & Fenghong Wang & Mohamed Osmani & Peter Demian, 2022. "Blockchain Enhanced Construction Waste Information Management: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-35, September.
    5. Guido Vonk & Stan Geertman & Paul Schot, 2007. "A SWOT Analysis of Planning Support Systems," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(7), pages 1699-1714, July.
    6. Parisa Zare & Christopher Pettit & Simone Leao & Ori Gudes & Balamurugan Soundararaj, 2022. "Geo-Design in Planning for Bicycling: An Evidence-Based Approach for Collaborative Bicycling Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Ertiö, Titiana-Petra & Bhagwatwar, Akshay, 2017. "Citizens as planners: Harnessing information and values from the bottom-up," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 111-113.
    8. Augusto Pimentel Pereira & Marcio Buzzo & Ingrid Zimermann & Frederico Huckembeck Neto & Hellisson Malgarezi, 2021. "A Descriptive 3D City Information Model Built From Infrastructure BIM: Capacity Building as a Strategy for Implementation," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 10(4), pages 138-151, October.
    9. te Brömmelstroet, Marco, 2017. "PSS are more user-friendly, but are they also increasingly useful?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 96-107.
    10. María Teresa Bastanchury-López & Carmen De-Pablos-Heredero, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis on Smart Cities Related to Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:5:y:2020:i:4:p:59-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.