IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v7y2019i2p169-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Promise and Perils of Direct Democracy: An Introduction

Author

Listed:
  • Todd Donovan

    (Political Science Department, Western Washington University, USA)

Abstract

Direct democracy promises politics that improve links between citizens and their representatives, and satisfies popular demand for increased engagement. In practice it may fall well short, given limited citizen capacity, poor information from campaigns, and ill-designed processes. The articles here represent the opportunities that direct democracy offers for the study of these promises and perils.

Suggested Citation

  • Todd Donovan, 2019. "The Promise and Perils of Direct Democracy: An Introduction," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 169-172.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:169-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2267
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos Rico Motos, 2019. "‘Let the Citizens Fix This Mess!’ Podemos’ Claim for Participatory Democracy in Spain," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 187-197.
    2. Henrik Serup Christensen, 2019. "Boosting Political Trust with Direct Democracy? The Case of the Finnish Citizens’ Initiative," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 173-186.
    3. James Organ, 2019. "Legal Regulation of Campaign Deliberation: Lessons from Brexit," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 268-277.
    4. Shaun Bowler & Todd Donovan, 2019. "Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gap," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 227-241.
    5. Johan A. Elkink & Stephen Quinlan & Richard Sinnott, 2019. "Economic Voting in EU Referendums: Sociotropic versus Egocentric Voting in the Lisbon Treaty Plebiscites in Ireland," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 334-350.
    6. Scott J. LaCombe & Courtney Juelich, 2019. "Salient Ballot Measures and the Millennial Vote," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 198-212.
    7. Sebastien Rojon & Arieke J. Rijken & Bert Klandermans, 2019. "A Survey Experiment on Citizens’ Preferences for ‘Vote–Centric’ vs. ‘Talk–Centric’ Democratic Innovations with Advisory vs. Binding Outcomes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 213-226.
    8. Alessandro Nai & Ferran Martínez i Coma, 2019. "Losing in the Polls, Time Pressure, and the Decision to Go Negative in Referendum Campaigns," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 278-296.
    9. Juan Masullo & Davide Morisi, 2019. "Risks and Opportunities of Direct Democracy: The Effect of Information in Colombia’s Peace Referendum," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 242-267.
    10. Caroline J. Tolbert & Christopher Witko & Cary Wolbers, 2019. "Public Support for Higher Taxes on the Wealthy: California’s Proposition 30," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 351-364.
    11. Arndt Leininger, 2019. "Economic Voting in Direct Democracy: A Case Study of the 2016 Italian Constitutional Referendum," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 306-333.
    12. Joshua J. Dyck & Wesley Hussey & Edward L. Lascher, Jr., 2019. "American State Ballot Initiatives and Income Inequality," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 380-409.
    13. Laurent Bernhard, 2019. "Intra-Camp Coalitions in Direct Democracy: Evidence from Referendums on Asylum," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 297-305.
    14. Francesco Veri, 2019. "Explaining Foreigners’ Political Rights in the Context of Direct Democracy: A Fuzzy-Set QCA of Swiss Cantonal Popular Votes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 410-426.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuriy V. Belousov, 2022. "Transparent Budget in the System of Public Administration," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 79-91, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastien Rojon & Jean-Benoit Pilet, 2021. "Engaged, Indifferent, Skeptical or Critical? Disentangling Attitudes towards Local Deliberative Mini-Publics in Four Western European Democracies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Courtney L. Juelich & Joseph A. Coll, 2021. "Ranked Choice Voting and Youth Voter Turnout: The Roles of Campaign Civility and Candidate Contact," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 319-331.
    3. Huang-Ting Yan, 2022. "The Decision to Go Negative: Election Types, Candidate Characteristics, and Electoral Competition," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 275-285.
    4. Daniela Braun & Markus Tausendpfund, 2020. "Electoral Behaviour in a European Union under Stress," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 28-40.
    5. Paul Agu Igwe, 2022. "The Paradox of Brexit and the Consequences of Taking Back Control," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Agersnap, Ole & Bjørkheim, Julie Brun, 2024. "Tax Complexity as Price Discrimination," Discussion Papers 2024/4, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    7. Hensmans, Manuel, 2021. "Exploring the dark and bright sides of Internet democracy: Ethos-reversing and ethos-renewing digital transformation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Emily Bacon & Michael D. Williams & Gareth H. Davies, 2023. "On the Combinatory Nature of Knowledge Transfer Conditions: A Mixed Method Assessment," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1039-1061, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:169-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.