IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v65y2012i12p27-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ko-Referat zu Karen Pittel

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Buchholz

Abstract

Der Vortrag von Karen Pittel hat unter anderem aufgezeigt, wie sich die im Rahmen der Energiewende verfolgten Ziele als Teilziele des für die Ökonomie zentralen Ziels der Wohlfahrtsmaximierung begreifen lassen. Zwischen den Teilzielen bestehen Konflikte, so dass die Aufgabe des Staates bei der Gestaltung der Energiepolitik auch darin zu bestehen hat, einen die Wohlfahrt maximierenden Kompromiss zwischen den einzelnen Zielen zu finden und dieses Zielbündel durch die Wahl geeigneter Maßnahmen umzusetzen. In meinem Kommentar möchte ich kurz darzustellen versuchen, welche spezifischen Charakteristika die mit der Energiewende verfolgten Ziele aufweisen und welche Konsequenzen sich daraus für eine an ökonomischen Standards orientierte Energiepolitik ergeben.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Buchholz, 2012. "Ko-Referat zu Karen Pittel," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 65(12), pages 27-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:65:y:2012:i:12:p:27-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2012_12_8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolfgang Buchholz & Johannes Pfeiffer, 2011. "Energy-policy implications of energy policy turnaround," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(18), pages 30-39, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renn, Ortwin & Marshall, Jonathan Paul, 2016. "Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “Energiewende”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 224-232.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:65:y:2012:i:12:p:27-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.