IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v61y2008i02p21-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reply to Kromphardt

Author

Listed:
  • Hans-Werner Sinn

Abstract

In his reply to Jürgen Kromphardts arguments, Hans-Werner Sinn argues that Kromphardt's statements on the unit labour costs and the increase of unit profits are correct in themselves, but his conclusion that the higher unit profits point to an underutilised scope for wage increases is wrong. In his calculation of the unit labour costs and unit profits, wages are compared only with average labour productivity. If one wants to determine the contribution that labour alone makes to production, one must consider the marginal productivity of labour. This factor alone determines in a market economy how high wages can be, because only with compensation on the basis of the marginal product is the total value of production sufficient to pay all factors of production. Sinn also refuses to accept the argument that higher minimum wages increase the demand for goods. This argument overlooks the fact that income is not only wage income and that a wage increase does not expand the income of a national economy but at best distributes it differently. The workers would have more, the entrepreneurs less. That would mean that the workers would consume more, but entrepreneurs would limit their purchases of goods.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans-Werner Sinn, 2008. "Reply to Kromphardt," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 61(02), pages 21-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:61:y:2008:i:02:p:21-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2008_2_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:61:y:2008:i:02:p:21-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.