IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cdh/commen/470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Getting Real: A Shadow Federal Budget for 2017

Author

Listed:
  • William B. P. Robson

    (C.D. Howe Institute)

  • Alexandre Laurin

    (C.D. Howe Institute)

  • Rosalie Wyonch

    (C.D. Howe Institute)

Abstract

The 2017 edition of the C.D. Howe Institute’s annual Shadow Federal Budget urges Ottawa to set out a path back toward balance to inspire confidence among savers and investors, accompanied by tax and spending measures to boost economic growth and opportunities. To reassure Canadians that federal finances are under control, and correct unrealistic expectations about spending encouraged by lack of discipline on the bottom line, this Shadow Budget ensures that, even with cautious economic forecasts and prudence cushions, the ratio of federal debt to gross domestic product will stabilize immediately. Among the measures that produce this result are continued restraint on transfers to other levels of government, and containment of Ottawa’s compensation costs. This Shadow Budget also contributes to fiscal discipline through improved accountability: clearer and more prominent presentation of the key revenue and spending numbers in the budget and the Estimates, and fair-value presentation of the federal government’s massive pension obligations. To boost economic growth and opportunities for Canadians, this Shadow Budget includes a variety of measures. Changes to the tax system focus on modernization, with recommendations to replace ongoing preferential tax treatment for small businesses with temporary preferential treatment for young businesses, and to tax returns on intellectual property investments at a lower rate to reflect their spillover effects to the broader economy. To enhance Canada’s international competitiveness, it proposes to replace aviation fuel taxes and other potential CO2-related levies with a new GST rate on fuels, and proposes to roughly double the threshold for the top personal tax rate. It also proposes to level the playing field for domestic producers of digital services relative to untaxed competitors abroad. It would raise the threshold for sales tax and customs duties levied on imports, and begin the phase-out of all import tariffs. And it would encourage business investment and equity relative to debt finance by establishing an allowance for corporate equity that relieves ordinary returns to capital from corporate income tax. On the spending side, this Shadow Budget prioritizes infrastructure projects Ottawa can drive on its own. It proposes to dispose of non-core assets and increase private investment in infrastructure by selling selected airport leases. Other measures would improve Canada’s job market, and support higher student achievement. Additional measures to boost Canada’s economy include updated mandates for Crown lenders, a backstop for catastrophic insurance, and reforms to help Canadians saving for retirement in RRSPs or target-benefit pension plans, and protect them against outliving their savings. In summary, this Shadow Budget marks a transition from the rhetoric of campaigning and the hesitations of a new government, to a package of concrete measures that will give Canadians confidence in the future of their country as a place to learn, work, and retire, and as a place to save and invest.

Suggested Citation

  • William B. P. Robson & Alexandre Laurin & Rosalie Wyonch, 2017. "Getting Real: A Shadow Federal Budget for 2017," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 470, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary_470.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thorsten V. Koeppl & James MacGee, 2015. "Mortgage Insurance as a Macroprudential Tool: Dealing with the Risk of a Housing Market Crash in Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 430, July.
    2. Tariq Fancy, 2012. "Can Venture Capital Foster Innovation in Canada? Yes, but Certain Types of Venture Capital Are Better Than Others," e-briefs 138, C.D. Howe Institute.
    3. Finn Poschmann & Philippe Bergevin, 2013. "Reining in the Risks: Rethinking the Role of Crown Financial Corporations in Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 372, February.
    4. Nicholas Le Pan, 2016. "Fault Lines: Earthquakes, Insurance, and Systemic Financial Risk," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 454, August.
    5. Robin W. Boadway & Jean-François Tremblay, 2016. "Modernizing Business Taxation," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 452, May.
    6. Benjamin Dachis & John Lester, 2015. "Small Business Preferences as a Barrier to Growth: Not so Tall After All," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 426, May.
    7. William B.P. Robson & Alex Laurin, 2015. "Adaptability, Accountability and Sustainability: Intergovernmental Fiscal Arrangements in Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 431, July.
    8. William B. P. Robson & Alexandre Laurin, 2017. "Hidden Spending: The Fiscal Impact of Federal Tax Concessions," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 469, February.
    9. Peter Howitt, 2015. "Mushrooms and Yeast: The Implications of Technological Progress for Canada's Economic Growth," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 433, September.
    10. Malcolm P. Hamilton, 2014. "Evaluating Public-Sector Pensions: Are Federal Public Servants Overpaid?," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 405, April.
    11. Steven Robins, 2017. "A Better Flight Path: How Ottawa can Cash In on Airports and Benefit Travellers," e-briefs 253, C.D. Howe Institute.
    12. Christine McDaniel & Simon Schropp & Olim Latipov, 2016. "Rights of Passage: The Economic Effects of Raising the DMT Threshold in Canada," e-briefs 239, C.D. Howe Institute.
    13. Bev Dahlby & Ergete Ferede, 2011. "What Does it Cost Society to Raise a Dollar of Tax Revenue? The Marginal Cost of Public Funds," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 324, March.
    14. William B.P. Robson, 2010. "Cutting Through Pension Complexity: Easy Steps Forward for the 2010 Federal Budget," C.D. Howe Institute Backgrounder, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 126, February.
    15. Mark Parsons, 2011. "Rewarding Innovation: Improving Federal Tax Support for Business R&D in Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 334, September.
    16. William B.P. Robson & Alex Laurin, 2016. "Worse Than It Looks: The True Burden and Risks of Federal Employee Pension Plans," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 449, May.
    17. Nick Pantaleo & Finn Poschmann & Scott Wilkie, 2013. "Improving the Tax Treatment of Intellectual Property Income in Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 379, April.
    18. Mati Dubrovinsky, 2014. "A Speedier and More Efficient Payments System for Canada," e-briefs 190, C.D. Howe Institute.
    19. Philip Bazel & Jack Mintz, 2016. "2015 Tax-Competitveness Report: Canada is losing its Attractiveness," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 9(37), November.
    20. Kevin Milligan, 2014. "Tax Policy for a New Era: Promoting Economic Growth and Fairness," Benefactors Lecture 2014, C.D. Howe Institute.
    21. Alexandre Laurin, 2015. "Shifting the Federal Tax Burden on the One-Percenters: A Losing Proposition," e-briefs 222, C.D. Howe Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alex Laurin, 2017. "Off Target: Assessing the Fairness of Ottawa’s Proposed Tax Reforms for “Passive” Investments in CCPCs," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 493, October.
    2. Benjamin Dachis, 2018. "Fiscal Soundness and Economic Growth: An Economic Program for Ontario," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 505, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William B.P. Robson & Alexandre Laurin & Rosalie Wyonch, 2018. "Righting the Course: A Shadow Federal Budget for 2018," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 503, February.
    2. William B.P. Robson & Alexandre Laurin, 2019. "Less Debt, More Growth: A Shadow Federal Budget for 2019," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 531, February.
    3. William B.P. Robson & Alex Laurin, 2016. "Where the Bucks Stop: A Shadow Federal Budget for 2016," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 447, March.
    4. Benjamin Dachis, 2018. "Fiscal Soundness and Economic Growth: An Economic Program for Ontario," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 505, March.
    5. Robin W. Boadway & Jean-François Tremblay, 2016. "Modernizing Business Taxation," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 452, May.
    6. Alex Laurin & William B.P. Robson, 2014. "Equipping Canadians for Success: A Shadow Budget for 2014," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 399, January.
    7. Jack Mintz & Philip Bazel, 2020. "The 2019 Tax Competitiveness Report: Canada’s Investment and Growth Challenge," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 13(1), March.
    8. William B.P. Robson & Alexandre Laurin, 2017. "Premium Compensation: The Ballooning Cost of Federal Government Employees," e-briefs 258, C.D. Howe Institute.
    9. Alexander Laurin & William Robson, 2020. "Supporting Growth, Restoring Confidence: A Shadow Federal Budget for 2020," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 567, March.
    10. Alex Laurin & William Robson, 2013. "Prudence and Opportunity: A Shadow Federal Budget for 2013," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 375, March.
    11. Daniel Schwanen, 2017. "Innovation Policy in Canada: A Holistic Approach," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 497, December.
    12. Ben Dachis & Robbie Brydon & Nicholas Chesterley, 2014. "Measuring Innovation in Canada: The Tale Told by Patent Applications," e-briefs 191, C.D. Howe Institute.
    13. Benjamin Dachis & William B.P. Robson & Nicholas Chesterley, 2014. "Capital Needed: Canada Needs More Robust Business Investment," e-briefs 179, C.D. Howe Institute.
    14. William B.P. Robson & Alexandre Laurin, 2015. "Challenges, Growth and Opportunity: A Shadow Federal Budget for 2015," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 423, April.
    15. L. (Lisa B.) Ryan & Andrew J. Kelly & Ivan Petrov & Yulu Guo & Sarah La Monaca, 2018. "An Assessment of the Social Costs and Benefits of Vehicle Tax Reform in Ireland," Open Access publications 10197/9906, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    16. Robert Knox, 2010. "Who Can Work Where: Reducing Barriers to Labour Mobility in Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Backgrounder, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 131, June.
    17. Alex Laurin, 2013. "A Reality Check for BC: The Impact of Behavioural Responses on the 2013 Budget's Proposed Income Tax Increases," e-briefs 155, C.D. Howe Institute.
    18. Don Drummond & Evan Capeluck & Matthew Calver, 2015. "The Key Challenge for Canadian Public Policy: Generating Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth," CSLS Research Reports 2015-11, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    19. Bev Dahlby & Kevin Milligan, 2017. "From theory to practice: Canadian economists’ contributions to public finance," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(5), pages 1324-1347, December.
    20. Poloz, Stephen S., 2021. "Technological progress and monetary policy: Managing the fourth industrial revolution," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fiscal and Tax Policy;

    JEL classification:

    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
    • H6 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kristine Gray (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdhowca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.