IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2023v3p138-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How The World'S Most Innovative Countries Evolved In The Period 2020-2022

Author

Listed:
  • TOMA SORIN-GEORGE

    (FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ADMINISTRATION, UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST, BUCHAREST, ROMANIA)

Abstract

As a factor that boosts value, increases competitiveness and drives growth, innovation plays a key role in today’s hypercompetitive global economic environment. This is why both countries and organizations have understood the need to look for new paths to constantly innovate because innovation has become critical in any field of activity. A nation’s competitiveness highly depends on its capacity to innovate. At a macro level, governments and policymakers have made significant efforts to invest in the right type of products, services, technologies and industries, especially since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Building strong and endurable national innovation ecosystems has become a major concern for governments around the world. The success of this initiative depends on numerous elements, such as the existence of an entrepreneurial culture, the development of knowledge-generation institutions (e.g., universities) and the expansion of public investments in research and development (R&D). The papery aims to briefly define the concept of innovation and present the ranking of the world’s most innovative countries in the period 2020-2022. The paper offers a theoretical framework for a deeper understanding of the concept of innovation as it highly contributes to the economic success of a country. Also, it presents the evolution of the top ten of the most innovative countries of the world in the period 2020-2022 and emphasizes the domination of the European countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Toma Sorin-George, 2023. "How The World'S Most Innovative Countries Evolved In The Period 2020-2022," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 138-143, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2023:v:3:p:138-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2023-03/17_TomaSorin2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sorin-George I. TOMA & Anca BRATU & Marin BURCEA, 2013. "When Business Strategy Meets Creativity," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 148-153, October.
    2. Philippe Aghion & Nick Bloom & Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & Peter Howitt, 2005. "Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 120(2), pages 701-728.
    3. Sorin George Toma, 2005. "Fordism, Postfordism and Globalization," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(17), pages 135-138, April.
    4. David J. TEECE, 2008. "Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Transfer And Licensing Of Know-How And Intellectual Property Understanding the Multinational Enterprise in the Modern World, chapter 5, pages 67-87, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Dragos TOHANEAN & Sorin-George TOMA & Ionel DUMITRU, 2018. "Organizational Performance and Digitalization in Industry 4.0," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 282-288, November.
    6. Sorin-George Toma, 2012. "A Pilot Study on the Relationships Among Organizational Learning, Change, and Sustainability in a Responsible Romanian Higher Education Institution," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(32), pages 420-435, June.
    7. Sorin George Toma, 2006. "From quality to the corporate social responsibility," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(20), pages 145-149, June.
    8. Rumen Dobrinsky, 2008. "Innovation as a Key Driver of Competitiveness," UNECE Annual Report Economic Essays 2008_6, UNECE.
    9. Karl Aiginger & Susanne Bärenthaler-Sieber & Johanna Vogel, 2013. "Competitiveness under New Perspectives. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 44," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47019, April.
    10. Sorin-George Toma & Shinji Naruo, 2009. "Quality Assurance in the Japanese Universities," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(26), pages 574-584, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sorin-George Toma, 2023. "The Age of Agile Enterprises," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 822-828, August.
    2. Toma Sorin-George & Gradinaru Catalin & Modreanu Andra, 2023. "The Evolution Of The Digital Economy In Romania In The Period 2019-2022," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 205-210, December.
    3. Toma Sorin George, 2023. "Corporate Strategy And Business Strategy," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 82-88, June.
    4. Andra Modreanu & Sorin-George Toma, 2023. "A Brief Analysis Of Social Media Brand Content And Strategy During The Covid-19 Pandemic," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 234-239, February.
    5. Andra MODREANU, 2022. "The Dimensions Of Strategy: A Study Case Of Unilever’S Responsible Umbrella Strategy," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 7(2), pages 139-149.
    6. Sorin-George Toma & Stefan Catana & Catalin Gradinaru, 2022. "Decoding the Lean Enterprise," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 762-767, September.
    7. Dosi, Giovanni & Palagi, Elisa & Roventini, Andrea & Russo, Emanuele, 2023. "Do patents really foster innovation in the pharmaceutical sector? Results from an evolutionary, agent-based model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 564-589.
    8. Erik Brouwer & Tom Poot & Kees Montfort, 2008. "The Innovation Threshold," De Economist, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 45-71, March.
    9. Cassiman, Bruno & ,, 2013. "Profiting from Innovation: Firm Level Evidence on Markups," CEPR Discussion Papers 9703, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. David Audretsch & Agustí Segarra & Mercedes Teruel, 2014. "Why don't all young firms invest in R&D?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 751-766, December.
    11. Gabriela Andrisan & Andra Modreanu, 2022. "Achieving Business Success in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Case of Procter & Gamble," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 482-490, September.
    12. Bhattacharya, Sourav & Chakraborty, Pavel & Chatterjee, Chirantan, 2022. "Intellectual property regimes and wage inequality," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Pei Sun & Ziliang Deng & Mike Wright, 2021. "Partnering with Leviathan: The politics of innovation in foreign-host-state joint ventures," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(4), pages 595-620, June.
    14. Sorin-George Toma & Andra Modreanu, 2022. "Competing for Dominance in Global Banking," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 227-233, Decembrie.
    15. Dragana Radicic & David Douglas & Geoff Pugh & Ian Jackson, 2019. "Cooperation For Innovation And Its Impact On Technological And Non-Technological Innovations: Empirical Evidence For European Smes In Traditional Manufacturing Industries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-41, June.
    16. Kristina McElheran, 2015. "Do Market Leaders Lead in Business Process Innovation? The Case(s) of E-business Adoption," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1197-1216, June.
    17. Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro & Un, C. Annique, 2007. "Regional economic integration and R&D investment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 227-246, March.
    18. Behrens, Vanessa & Berger, Marius & Hud, Martin & Hünermund, Paul & Iferd, Younes & Peters, Bettina & Rammer, Christian & Schubert, Torben, 2017. "Innovation activities of firms in Germany - Results of the German CIS 2012 and 2014: Background report on the surveys of the Mannheim Innovation Panel Conducted in the Years 2013 to 2016," ZEW Dokumentationen 17-04, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    19. Bradley, Wendy A. & Kolev, Julian, 2023. "How does digital piracy affect innovation? Evidence from software firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(3).
    20. Modreanu Andra & Gabriela Nicoleta Andrisan, 2022. "An Overview Of The Typology Of Strategy," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 206-211, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2023:v:3:p:138-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.