IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2020v6p118-123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sap And Rpa Implementation In Production Area - Risks During The Pandemic Periode. A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • BANTA VIOREL COSTIN

    (THE BUCHAREST UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES)

Abstract

The period we are going through now has not been a very good one from an economic point of view. Many companies have suffered, some have reduced their number of employees, others have closed. Sad but true, in the conjuncture given by this Coronavirus, life had some major losses. Even ERP-type system implementations have suffered. From an analysis made this year, the number of implementations decreased by up to 60%. All the started projects were maintained, but new projects started, there were very few. In this paper, the author wants to bring to the fore the reopening of large companies to RPA-robotic Process Automation but also the involvement of AI-Artificial Intelligence in automating economic processes within existing subcomponents. One thing to consider is that social distancing, working from home, the growing existence of people (physically speaking) in factories, leads to a rethinking of monitoring, control and action strategies for those who work with machines (their automation being a stringent and uninhabitable thing). Where SAP is an integrated system-things are moving very well due to the multitude of existing interfaces and the fact that this system adapts very quickly to the requirements of the business environment. In this study we will make some remarks about the way in which software robots appear in our lives, they help to achieve repetitive and long-lasting things. We used here an implementation scenario made with the help of UiPath software robots, these having the role of automating some economic processes, we mention here P2P (Procure-to-pay), in a factory producing car components for other car manufacturers, from all over the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Banta Viorel Costin, 2020. "Sap And Rpa Implementation In Production Area - Risks During The Pandemic Periode. A Case Study," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 118-123, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2020:v:6:p:118-123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2020-06/17_Banta2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Van Looy & M. De Backer & G. Poels & M. Snoeck, 2012. "Choosing the right business process maturity model," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 12/808, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enrique Mu & Howard Stern, 2018. "A Contingent/Assimilation Framework for Public Interorganizational Systems Decisions: Should the City of Pittsburgh and Allegheny County Consolidate Information Technology Services?," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(06), pages 1611-1658, November.
    2. Remco Dijkman & Sander Vincent Lammers & Ad Jong, 2016. "Properties that influence business process management maturity and its effect on organizational performance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 717-734, August.
    3. Maciejczak, Mariusz, 2014. "Process Maturity Of Short Food Supply Chains," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 2(4), pages 1-15.
    4. Ma³gorzata Okrêglicka & Monika Mynarzova & Radomir Kana, 2015. "Business Process Maturity In Small And Mediumsized Enterprises," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 12(1), pages 121-131, DEcember.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2020:v:6:p:118-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.