IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v50y2005i2id5596-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Significance of different types and levels of antigen-specific immunity to Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniaeinfection in piglets

Author

Listed:
  • K. Nechvatalova

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
    University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • P. Knotigova

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • J. Krejci

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • M. Faldyna

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
    University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • E. Gopfert

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • P. Satran

    (University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • M. Toman

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
    University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to verify under experimental conditions the hypothesis that a reliable protection of piglets against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (App) infection can be obtained by colostrum-derived antibodies and/or a low-dose infection from sows naturally infected with App. Twenty-eight piglets were allocated into four groups. Piglets of groups 1A and 1B were the progeny of App-seronegative sows, piglets of groups 2A and 2B originated from App-seropositive sows. At the age of 4 weeks, piglets in groups 1A and 2A were exposed to a low infection dose with the pathogenic strain of App serotype 9 (4 × 104 CFU/ml). At the age of 8 weeks, all four groups of piglets were exposed to the App serotype 9 challenge (2.5 × 107 CFU/ml). We compared the differences in clinical, radiological, pathological changes and cytological findings in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage samples between groups with different levels of antigen-specific immunity after challenge. Piglets that obtained colostrum-derived antibodies and experienced a low-dose App infection were best protected against App challenge. More apparent clinical and pathological changes were observed in groups protected with either only colostrum-derived antibodies or active immunity induced by a preceding low-dose infection. However, none of the types of protection prevented developing of the disease and characteristic changes in the lungs. Cell counts changes in blood and lavage gave evidence of only bacterial infection in progress; however, between-group differences were not marked. Antibodies (IgG, IgA) present in the respiratory tract at the time of challenge played a major role in protection against App infection.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Nechvatalova & P. Knotigova & J. Krejci & M. Faldyna & E. Gopfert & P. Satran & M. Toman, 2005. "Significance of different types and levels of antigen-specific immunity to Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniaeinfection in piglets," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(2), pages 47-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:50:y:2005:i:2:id:5596-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/5596-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/5596-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/5596-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/5596-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. Šatrán & K. Nedbalcová, 2002. "Prevalence of serotypes, production of Apx toxins, and antibiotic resistance in strains of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolated in the Czech Republic," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 47(4), pages 92-98.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. Krejci & K. Nechvatalova & M. Blahutkova & M. Faldyna, 2013. "The respiratory tract in pigs and its immune system: a review," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(4), pages 206-220.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Nedbalcova & P. Satran & Z. Jaglic & R. Ondriasova & Z. Kucerova, 2005. "Monitoring of antibiotic resistance in isolates of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniaein the Czech Republic between 2001 and 2003," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(5), pages 181-185.
    2. I. Holko & J. Urbanova & Tholkova & V. Kmet, 2004. "Diagnostics of main bacterial agents of porcine respiratory diseases complex (PRDC) using PCR detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(2), pages 35-41.
    3. Z. Kucerova & Z. Jaglic & R. Ondriasova & K. Nedbalcova, 2005. "Serotype distribution of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolated from porcine pleuropneumonia in the Czech Republicduring period 2003-2004," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(8), pages 355-360.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:50:y:2005:i:2:id:5596-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.