IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/revmkt/v2y2004i1p41n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Heterogeneity in Discrete Choice Models Using a Dirichlet Process Prior

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Jin Gyo

    (MIT Sloan School of Management, kimjg@mit.edu)

  • Menzefricke Ulrich

    (Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, menzefricke@rotman.utoronto.ca)

  • Feinberg Fred M.

    (University of Michigan Business School, feinf@umich.edu)

Abstract

The finite normal mixture model has emerged as a dominant methodology for assessing heterogeneity in choice models. Although it extends the classic mixture models by allowing within component variablility, it requires that a relatively large number of models be separately estimated and fairly difficult test procedures to determine the correct number of mixing components. We present a very general formulation, based on Dirichlet Process Piror, which yields the number and composition of mixing components a posteriori, obviating the need for post hoc test procedures and is capable of approximating any target heterogeneity distribution. Adapting Stephens (2000) algorithm allows the determination of substantively different clusters, as well as a way to sidestep problems arising from label-switching and overlapping mixtures. These methods are illustrated both on simulated data and A.C. Nielsen scanner panel data for liquid detergents. We find that the large number of mixing components required to adequately represent the heterogeneity distribution can be reduced in practice to a far smaller number of segments of managerial relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Jin Gyo & Menzefricke Ulrich & Feinberg Fred M., 2004. "Assessing Heterogeneity in Discrete Choice Models Using a Dirichlet Process Prior," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-41, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:revmkt:v:2:y:2004:i:1:p:41:n:1
    DOI: 10.2202/1546-5616.1003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1546-5616.1003
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1546-5616.1003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:revmkt:v:2:y:2004:i:1:p:41:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.