IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jqsprt/v18y2022i1p15-34n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the performance of elite level volleyball players

Author

Listed:
  • Fellingham Gilbert W.

    (Brigham Young University, Provo, USA)

Abstract

Evaluation of individuals in a team sport setting is inherently difficult. The level of play of one individual is fundamentally tied to the level of play of the teammates. One way to think about evaluation of individuals is to ‘insert’ the posterior distribution of the parameter that measures individual play into an ‘average’ team, and see how the probability of success (or failure) changes. Using a Bayesian hierarchical logistic model, we can estimate both the average contribution to success of various positions, and the individual contribution of all the players in that position. In this paper, we use data from the 2018 World Championships in Volleyball to model both the position played and the players within each position. Using both the posterior distributions for the mean performance of the different positions, and the posterior distributions for the individual players, we can then estimate the change in the number of points scored for a team with a change from an average player to the individual under consideration. We compute both the points scored above average per set (PAAPS) and the points scored above average per 100 touches (PP100) for 168 men and 168 women playing five different positions. Contributions of the various position groups and of individual players within each position are evaluated and compared.

Suggested Citation

  • Fellingham Gilbert W., 2022. "Evaluating the performance of elite level volleyball players," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 15-34, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:18:y:2022:i:1:p:15-34:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/jqas-2021-0056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2021-0056
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jqas-2021-0056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:18:y:2022:i:1:p:15-34:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.