IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jqsprt/v17y2021i4p255-271n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opening up the court: analyzing player performance across tennis Grand Slams

Author

Listed:
  • Gallagher Shannon K.
  • Frisoli Kayla

    (Dept. of Statistics & Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA)

  • Luby Amanda

    (Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, USA)

Abstract

In tennis, the Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, and US Open are the four most prestigious events (Grand Slams). These four Grand Slams differ in the composition of the court surfaces, when they are played in the year, and which city hosts the players. Individual Grand Slams come with different expectations, and it is often thought that some players achieve better results at some Grand Slams than others. It is also thought that differences in results may be attributed, at least partially, to surface type of the courts. For example, Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer, and Serena Williams have achieved their best results on clay, grass, and hard courts, respectively. This paper explores differences among Grand Slams, while adjusting for confounders such as tour, competitor strength, and player attributes. More specifically, we examine the effect of the Grand Slam on player performance for matches from 2013 to 2019. We take two approaches to modeling these data: (1) a mixed-effects model accounting for both player and tournament features and (2) models that emphasize individual performance. We identify differences across the Grand Slams at both the tournament and individual player level.

Suggested Citation

  • Gallagher Shannon K. & Frisoli Kayla & Luby Amanda, 2021. "Opening up the court: analyzing player performance across tennis Grand Slams," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 17(4), pages 255-271, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:17:y:2021:i:4:p:255-271:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/jqas-2019-0015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2019-0015
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jqas-2019-0015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:17:y:2021:i:4:p:255-271:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.