IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jqsprt/v10y2014i4p13n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scoring rules, and the role of chance: Analysis of the 2008 World Fly Fishing Championships

Author

Listed:
  • Yee Thomas W.

    (Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand)

Abstract

We analyze the 2008 World Fly Fishing Championships data to examine two issues: (I) changes to scoring rules are proposed so that catching bigger fish is no longer a disadvantage; and (II) the relative role of chance versus competitor skill in determining the competition outcomes is investigated. For (I), a new quadratic polynomial formula for the number of points awarded for a fish of a certain length meant that the competitor who caught the biggest fish in one of the rivers was no longer disadvantaged, during the 20-min period it took to land the fish, compared to those anglers who caught many small fish. For (II), it was found that an angler A, who is actually better than angler B, has an approximate probability of 8.5% of having, overall, a worse score than angler B. By increasing the number of fishing sessions from five to seven, the probability of misclassification drops to about 7%. Other topics, such as the advantages of the proposed formula and the various fishing strategies, are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yee Thomas W., 2014. "Scoring rules, and the role of chance: Analysis of the 2008 World Fly Fishing Championships," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:10:y:2014:i:4:p:13:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/jqas-2013-0124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2013-0124
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jqas-2013-0124?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:10:y:2014:i:4:p:13:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.