IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/worlde/v37y2014i9p1219-1236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pure Exporter: Theory and Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiangyong Lu
  • Yi Lu
  • Zhigang Tao

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="twec12108-abs-0001"> This article provides the first evidence about pure exporters (i.e. firms exporting all of their output to the foreign market) – a phenomenon overlooked and cannot be explained in the existing literature. It then offers a theoretical analysis of the existence and behaviour of pure exporters. In particular, pure exporters arise when the export market is sufficiently large – a situation more likely to hold in developing countries as opposed to large developed countries, and their productivity levels are above those of nonexporters, but below those of firms having both domestic sales and export. These theoretical predictions are borne out in a data of Chinese manufacturing firms for the period of 1998–2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiangyong Lu & Yi Lu & Zhigang Tao, 2014. "Pure Exporter: Theory and Evidence from China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9), pages 1219-1236, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:37:y:2014:i:9:p:1219-1236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/twec.2014.37.issue-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabrice Defever & Alejandro Riaño, 2016. "Protectionism through Exporting: Subsidies with Export Share Requirements in China," Discussion Papers 2016-03, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    2. Bo Gao & Mich Tvede, 2017. "The Impact of Trade with Pure Exporters," Working Papers 2017_05, Durham University Business School.
    3. Zara Liaqat & Karrar Hussain, 2020. "En route to the world: understanding firms that solely export," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 2872-2886.
    4. Fabrice Defever & Alejandro Riaño, 2017. "China’s Dual Export Sector," Discussion Papers 2017-01, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    5. Gábor Békés & Balázs Muraközy, 2018. "The ladder of internationalization modes: evidence from European firms," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 154(3), pages 455-491, August.
    6. Doungdao Mahakitsiri & Wisarut Suwanprasert, 2023. "Who are pure exporters?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 1759-1781, June.
    7. Xiaoling Wang & Haiying Lin & Olaf Weber, 2016. "Does Adoption of Management Standards Deliver Efficiency Gain in Firms’ Pursuit of Sustainability Performance? An Empirical Investigation of Chinese Manufacturing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Chen, Bo, 2021. "Labor market matching with ensuing competitive externalities in large economies," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 12-17.
    9. Greaney, Theresa M. & Li, Yao & Tu, Dongmei, 2017. "Pollution control and foreign firms’ exit behavior in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 148-159.
    10. Lin, Kefu & Zeng, Dao-Zhi, 2023. "International trade with binary preferences and heterogeneous productivity," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    11. Bo Gao & Mich Tvede, 2022. "The impact of trade with pure exporters," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 83-112, February.
    12. Defever, Fabrice & Riaño, Alejandro, 2017. "Subsidies with export share requirements in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 33-51.
    13. Xi Lin & Ling-Yun He, 2023. "The More the Merrier? Evidence from Firm-Level Exports and Environmental Performance in China," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 125-172, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:37:y:2014:i:9:p:1219-1236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0378-5920 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.