IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v26y2005i11p1083-1086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is performance driven by industry‐ or firm‐specific factors? A reply to McNamara, Aime, and Vaaler

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Hawawini
  • Venkat Subramanian
  • Paul Verdin

Abstract

We revisit the questions of identification of outlying firms within industries and their impact on the relative importance of firm‐ and industry‐specific factors for firm performance. In response to McNamara, Aime and Valler (2005), we argue that the key results in Hawawini, Subramnian and Verdin (2003) are insensitive to the varying methods used to identify firm outliers. Further, we argue that conducting tests on industry outliers are inconsistent to what is indicated by theory and past empirical results on the relative importance of firm and industry effects to firm performance. Firm effects may matter most for outperforming and underpeforming firms, while industry effects may be at least as important to firms ‘stuck in the middle’. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Hawawini & Venkat Subramanian & Paul Verdin, 2005. "Is performance driven by industry‐ or firm‐specific factors? A reply to McNamara, Aime, and Vaaler," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(11), pages 1083-1086, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:26:y:2005:i:11:p:1083-1086
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.500
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.500?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Schiefer & Stefan Hirsch & Monika Hartmann & Adelina Gschwandtner, 2013. "Industry, firm, year and country effects on profitability in EU food processing," Studies in Economics 1309, School of Economics, University of Kent.
    2. G Johnes & J Johnes, 2009. "Strategic Responses to Companies'' Own Past Performance: Why do some Firms Fare Better Than Others?," Working Papers 602555, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    3. Øystein Gjerde & Kjell Knivsflå & Frode Sættem, 2010. "Evidence on competitive advantage and superior stock market performance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 277-301.
    4. Lai, Richard, 2007. "Inventory and the Shape of the Earth," MPRA Paper 4754, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Schiefer, Jan & Hartmann, Monika, 2013. "Industry, firm, year, and country effects on profitability in EU food processing," Discussion Papers 162878, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    6. Spyridon Stavropoulos & Martijn J. Burger & Dimitris Skuras, 2015. "Data Sparseness and Variance in Accounting Profitability," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-014/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    7. Raza, Syed Ali & Farooq, M. Shoaib & Khan, Nadeem, 2011. "Firm and industry effects on firm profitability: an empirical analysis of KSE," MPRA Paper 36797, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Goddard, John & Tavakoli, Manouche & Wilson, John O.S., 2009. "Sources of variation in firm profitability and growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 495-508, April.
    9. repec:lan:wpaper:1107 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Zouaghi, Ferdaous & Hirsch, Stefan & Garcia, Mercedes Sanchez, 2016. "What Drives Firm Profitability? A Multilevel Approach To The Spanish Agri-Food Sector," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244762, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    11. Ketelhöhn, Niels W. & Quintanilla, Carlos, 2012. "Country effects on profitability: A multilevel approach using a sample of Central American firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 1767-1772.
    12. repec:lan:wpaper:1029 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:26:y:2005:i:11:p:1083-1086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.