IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v24y2003i1p87-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failed takeover attempts, corporate governance and refocusing

Author

Listed:
  • Sayan Chatterjee
  • Jeffrey S. Harrison
  • Donald D. Bergh

Abstract

Hostile takeover attempts oftentimes signal that a target firm has an over‐diversified and ineffective corporate strategy. What does this signal mean when takeover attempts fail? Drawing from agency theory, we argue that target firms managed by independent directory boards are likely to ignore the takeover attempt and not refocus their firms' strategy. Conversely, target firms managed by nonindependent boards are more likely to view the failed takeover attempt as a ‘wake‐up call’ and will refocus their firms' strategy so as to preserve the firm's survival. These arguments are tested using a sample of 76 firms that were targets of failed hostile takeover attempts. Logistic regression analyses confirm the predictions. This study suggests that in the aftermath of a failed takeover attempt board of director characteristics can help predict changes in corporate strategies. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Sayan Chatterjee & Jeffrey S. Harrison & Donald D. Bergh, 2003. "Failed takeover attempts, corporate governance and refocusing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 87-96, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:24:y:2003:i:1:p:87-96
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.279
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dongyoub Shin & Sunhyuk Kim & Kiwon Jung, 2016. "Intended rationality in exit decisions: The organizational field of rivals as a source of signal in segment exit decisions by Korean SI ventures, 2000–2006," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 41(2), pages 398-421, May.
    2. Angélica María Sánchez-Riofrío & Luis Ángel Guerras-Martín & Francisco Javier Forcadell, 2015. "Business portfolio restructuring: a comprehensive bibliometric review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 1921-1950, March.
    3. Campbell, Robert J. & Limbach, Peter & Reusche, Johannes, 2022. "Once bitten, twice shy: Failed deals and subsequent M&A cautiousness," CFR Working Papers 22-09, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    4. Philipp Meyer‐Doyle & Sunkee Lee & Constance E. Helfat, 2019. "Disentangling the microfoundations of acquisition behavior and performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(11), pages 1733-1756, November.
    5. Gregorio Sánchez‐Marín & María Encarnación Lucas‐Pérez & Samuel Baixauli‐Soler & Brian G.M. Main & Antonio Mínguez‐Vera, 2022. "Excess executive compensation and corporate governance in the United Kingdom and Spain: A comparative analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2817-2837, October.
    6. Sayan Chatterjee, 2009. "Does Increased Equity Ownership Lead to More Strategically Involved Boards?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 267-277, April.
    7. Kyungsuk Lee & Taewoo Roh, 2020. "Proactive Divestiture and Business Innovation: R&D Input and Output Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Park, Choelsoon & Kim, Seonghoon, 2008. "Corporate governance, regulatory changes, and corporate restructuring in Korea, 1993-2004," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 66-84, January.
    9. Jesus Sáenz González & Emma García-Meca, 2014. "Does Corporate Governance Influence Earnings Management in Latin American Markets?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 419-440, May.
    10. David H. Zhu & James D. Westphal, 2011. "Misperceiving the Beliefs of Others: How Pluralistic Ignorance Contributes to the Persistence of Positive Security Analyst Reactions to the Adoption of Stock Repurchase Plans," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 869-886, August.
    11. Wu, Yan & Strange, Roger & Shirodkar, Vikrant, 2021. "MNE divestments of foreign affiliates: Does the strategic role of the affiliate have an impact?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 266-278.
    12. Heather Berry, 2013. "When Do Firms Divest Foreign Operations?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 246-261, February.
    13. João Paulo Vieito & António Cerqueira & Elísio Brandão & Walayet A. Khan, 2009. "Executive Compensation: the Finance Perspective," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 0(1), pages 3-32.
    14. Terry McNulty & Andrew Pettigrew & Greg Jobome & Clare Morris, 2011. "The role, power and influence of company chairs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(1), pages 91-121, February.
    15. Praet, Alain, 2013. "Family firms and the divestment decision: An agency perspective," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 34-41.
    16. Lee, Kangbok & Joo, Sunghoon & Baik, Hyeoncheol & Han, Sumin & In, Joonhwan, 2020. "Unbalanced data, type II error, and nonlinearity in predicting M&A failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 271-287.
    17. Salamaga Marcin, 2021. "The use of Correspondence Analysis in the Study of Foreign Divestment in the Visegrad Countries during the Coronavirus Crisis," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 15-26, June.
    18. Zhonghua Wu & Andrew Delios, 2009. "The Emergence of Portfolio Restructuring in Japan," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 313-335, June.
    19. Rama Krishna Reddy & Frances Fabian, 2020. "Information Asymmetry and Host Country Institutions in Cross-Border Acquisitions," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 909-938, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:24:y:2003:i:1:p:87-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.