IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v74y2020i3p439-457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical models for independence structures of networks

Author

Listed:
  • Kayvan Sadeghi
  • Alessandro Rinaldo

Abstract

We introduce a new family of network models, called hierarchical network models, that allow us to represent in an explicit manner the stochastic dependence among the dyads (random ties) of the network. In particular, each member of this family can be associated with a graphical model defining conditional independence clauses among the dyads of the network, called the dependency graph. Every network model with dyadic independence assumption can be generalized to construct members of this new family. Using this new framework, we generalize the Erdös–Rényi and the β models to create hierarchical Erdös–Rényi and β models. We describe various methods for parameter estimation, as well as simulation studies for models with sparse dependency graphs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kayvan Sadeghi & Alessandro Rinaldo, 2020. "Hierarchical models for independence structures of networks," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 439-457, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:74:y:2020:i:3:p:439-457
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.12200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12200
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.12200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos Lozares & Joan Verd & Irene Cruz & Oriol Barranco, 2014. "Homophily and heterophily in personal networks. From mutual acquaintance to relationship intensity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2657-2670, September.
    2. Mathias Drton & Thomas S. Richardson, 2008. "Binary models for marginal independence," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(2), pages 287-309, April.
    3. Hunter, David R. & Goodreau, Steven M. & Handcock, Mark S., 2013. "ergm.userterms: A Template Package for Extending statnet," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 52(i02).
    4. A. Roverato & M. Lupparelli & L. La Rocca, 2013. "Log-mean linear models for binary data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 100(2), pages 485-494.
    5. Hunter, David R. & Goodreau, Steven M. & Handcock, Mark S., 2008. "Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 248-258, March.
    6. Steffen Lauritzen & Alessandro Rinaldo & Kayvan Sadeghi, 2018. "Random networks, graphical models and exchangeability," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(3), pages 481-508, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioannis Ntzoufras & Claudia Tarantola, 2012. "Conjugate and Conditional Conjugate Bayesian Analysis of Discrete Graphical Models of Marginal Independence," Quaderni di Dipartimento 178, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    2. John McLevey & Alexander V. Graham & Reid McIlroy-Young & Pierson Browne & Kathryn S. Plaisance, 2018. "Interdisciplinarity and insularity in the diffusion of knowledge: an analysis of disciplinary boundaries between philosophy of science and the sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 331-349, October.
    3. Alberto Roverato, 2015. "Log-mean Linear Parameterization for Discrete Graphical Models of Marginal Independence and the Analysis of Dichotomizations," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(2), pages 627-648, June.
    4. Monia Lupparelli & Alberto Roverato, 2017. "Log-mean linear regression models for binary responses with an application to multimorbidity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(2), pages 227-252, February.
    5. Kei, Yik Lun & Chen, Yanzhen & Madrid Padilla, Oscar Hernan, 2023. "A partially separable model for dynamic valued networks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. He, Xi-jun & Dong, Yan-bo & Wu, Yu-ying & Jiang, Guo-rui & Zheng, Yao, 2019. "Factors affecting evolution of the interprovincial technology patent trade networks in China based on exponential random graph models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 443-457.
    7. Ntzoufras, Ioannis & Tarantola, Claudia, 2013. "Conjugate and conditional conjugate Bayesian analysis of discrete graphical models of marginal independence," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 161-177.
    8. Robin J. Evans & Thomas S. Richardson, 2013. "Marginal log-linear parameters for graphical Markov models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(4), pages 743-768, September.
    9. Sándor Juhász, 2021. "Spinoffs and tie formation in cluster knowledge networks," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1385-1404, April.
    10. Tom A. B. Snijders & Christian E. G. Steglich, 2015. "Representing Micro–Macro Linkages by Actor-based Dynamic Network Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 44(2), pages 222-271, May.
    11. Stefano Ghinoi & Riccardo Vita & Bodo Steiner & Alessandro Sinatra, 2024. "Family firm network strategies in regional clusters: evidence from Italy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 87-103, January.
    12. Cornelius Fritz & Michael Lebacher & Göran Kauermann, 2020. "Tempus volat, hora fugit: A survey of tie‐oriented dynamic network models in discrete and continuous time," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 275-299, August.
    13. Lorenza Rossi & Emilio Zanetti Chini, 2016. "Firms’ Dynamics and Business Cycle: New Disaggregated Data," DEM Working Papers Series 123, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    14. Tiandong Wang & Panpan Zhang, 2022. "Directed hybrid random networks mixing preferential attachment with uniform attachment mechanisms," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(5), pages 957-986, October.
    15. Anna‐Maria Kindt & Matthias Geissler & Kilian Bühling, 2022. "Be my (little) partner?!—Universities' role in regional innovation systems when large firms are rare," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 1274-1295, November.
    16. Ladan Ghahramani & Jalayer Khalilzadeh & Birendra KC, 2018. "Tour guides’ communication ecosystems: an inferential social network analysis approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 103-130, December.
    17. Monia Lupparelli & Giovanni M. Marchetti & Wicher P. Bergsma, 2009. "Parameterizations and Fitting of Bi‐directed Graph Models to Categorical Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(3), pages 559-576, September.
    18. Milad Abbasiharofteh & Tom Broekel, 2021. "Still in the shadow of the wall? The case of the Berlin biotechnology cluster," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 73-94, February.
    19. Brennecke, Julia & Rank, Olaf, 2017. "The firm’s knowledge network and the transfer of advice among corporate inventors—A multilevel network study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 768-783.
    20. Kabirigi, Michel & Abbasiharofteh, Milad & Sun, Zhanli & Hermans, Frans, 2022. "The importance of proximity dimensions in agricultural knowledge and innovation systems: The case of banana disease management in Rwanda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:74:y:2020:i:3:p:439-457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.