IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v101y2020i4p1634-1641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judgments of Capability and Conformity as Distinct Forms of Social Judgments, and the Way They Interact to Shape Evaluator Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Başak Topaler
  • Eyüp Tolunay Küp

Abstract

Objective Social judgments are evaluators’ opinions about the social properties of a set of actors. Different types of judgments rendered by the evaluators and potential interactions between them may have major consequences for the actors who are evaluated. In this article, we distinguish between judgments of capability and conformity, and examine their concurrent and interdependent effects on evaluator impressions. Methods We investigate these dynamics in the context of authors competing for the best paper award at the Academy of Management (AoM) conference. Results Findings of our empirical analyses demonstrate interdependent effects of capability and conformity judgments on the committee members’ decisions. We demonstrate that evaluators expect greater conformity to their ideal template from more capable actors who have greater potential to contribute to these ideals. Conclusion Our study advances the literature on social judgments by showing that congruence (or incongruence) among distinct types of judgment shape evaluators’ decisions, beyond their independent effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Başak Topaler & Eyüp Tolunay Küp, 2020. "Judgments of Capability and Conformity as Distinct Forms of Social Judgments, and the Way They Interact to Shape Evaluator Decisions," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1634-1641, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:4:p:1634-1641
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12823
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12823?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beth Miller Vonnahme, 2014. "Surviving Scandal: An Exploration of the Immediate and Lasting Effects of Scandal on Candidate Evaluation," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(5), pages 1308-1321, December.
    2. Wei Zhao & Xueguang Zhou, 2011. "Status Inconsistency and Product Valuation in the California Wine Market," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1435-1448, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kashyap Ravi, 2020. "The Economics of Enlightenment: Time Value of Knowledge and the Net Present Value (NPV) of Knowledge Machines, A Proposed Approach Adapted from Finance," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Pengfei Wang & Michael Jensen, 2019. "A Bridge Too Far: Divestiture as a Strategic Reaction to Status Inconsistency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 859-878, February.
    3. Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2014. "What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57602, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Heeyon Kim & Bo Kyung Kim, 2022. "To be in Vogue: How mere proximity to high‐status neighbors affects aspirational pricing in the U.S. fashion industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(6), pages 1208-1230, June.
    5. Daniel M. Olson & David M. Waguespack, 2020. "Strategic behavior by market intermediaries," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(13), pages 2474-2492, December.
    6. Simone T. Peinkofer & Yao Henry Jin, 2023. "The impact of order fulfillment information disclosure on consequences of deceptive counterfeits," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 237-260, January.
    7. Wanda J. Orlikowski & Susan V. Scott, 2014. "What Happens When Evaluation Goes Online? Exploring Apparatuses of Valuation in the Travel Sector," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 868-891, June.
    8. Jerry W. Kim & Brayden G King, 2014. "Seeing Stars: Matthew Effects and Status Bias in Major League Baseball Umpiring," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2619-2644, November.
    9. Karen O. Caballero Armendariz & Ben Farrer & Monica Martinez, 2020. "Badge of Courage or Sign of Criminality? Experimental Evidence for How Voters Respond to Candidates Who Were Arrested at a Protest," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(6), pages 2203-2219, October.
    10. Eric Yanfei Zhao & P. Devereaux Jennings & Masakazu Ishihara & Michael Lounsbury, 2018. "Optimal Distinctiveness in the Console Video Game Industry: An Exemplar-Based Model of Proto-Category Evolution," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 588-611, August.
    11. Alexandre Bohas & Pierre-Xavier Meschi, 2023. "In vino vanitas: Social dynamics and performance of Chinese château acquisitions in the Bordeaux vineyards," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(2), pages 306-331, March.
    12. Nicholas Chad Long, 2019. "The Impact of Incumbent Scandals on Senate Elections, 1972–2016," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Rathee, Shelly & Masters, Tamara M. & Yu-Buck, Grace F., 2022. "So fun! How fun brand names affect forgiveness of hedonic and utilitarian products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 44-55.
    14. Kashyap Ravi, 2020. "The Economics of Enlightenment: Time Value of Knowledge and the Net Present Value (NPV) of Knowledge Machines, A Proposed Approach Adapted from Finance," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:4:p:1634-1641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.