IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reesec/v51y2023i5p1246-1284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do institutional investors react to local shocks during a crisis? A test using the COVID‐19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • David C. Ling
  • Chongyu Wang
  • Tingyu Zhou

Abstract

We examine how institutional investors reacted to geographically dispersed local shocks during the early stages of the COVID‐19 pandemic. A sample of real estate investment trusts (REITs) enables us to link two layers of geography: the locations of the assets in which the REITs were invested and the headquarters locations of institutional investors who owned REIT shares. We find that the institutional ownership of firms with an economic interest in the investors’ home markets declined more if those markets were heavily affected by the pandemic. In addition, the ownership responses to the COVID‐19 shock were larger in those markets in which REITs had larger portfolio allocations and in markets that were home to the investors. Importantly, we find that nonpassive and short‐term investors may have overreacted to the local shocks because their REIT portfolios subsequently underperformed relative to passive and long‐term investors. Our study highlights the importance of geography in the formation of investors’ expectations during market crises.

Suggested Citation

  • David C. Ling & Chongyu Wang & Tingyu Zhou, 2023. "How do institutional investors react to local shocks during a crisis? A test using the COVID‐19 pandemic," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 51(5), pages 1246-1284, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:51:y:2023:i:5:p:1246-1284
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.12439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12439
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-6229.12439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:51:y:2023:i:5:p:1246-1284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/areueea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.