IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reesec/v46y2018i2p404-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geographic Portfolio Allocations, Property Selection and Performance Attribution in Public and Private Real Estate Markets

Author

Listed:
  • David C. Ling
  • Andy Naranjo
  • Benjamin Scheick

Abstract

This article examines the effects of geographic portfolio concentrations on the return performance of U.S. public real estate investment trusts versus private commercial real estate over the 1996–2013 time period. Adjusting private market returns for differences in geographic concentrations with public markets, we find that core private market performance falls. Using return performance attribution analysis, we find that the geographic allocation effect constitutes only a small portion of the total return difference between listed and private market returns, whereas individual property selection within geographic locations explains, in part, the documented outperformance of listed versus private real estate market returns.

Suggested Citation

  • David C. Ling & Andy Naranjo & Benjamin Scheick, 2018. "Geographic Portfolio Allocations, Property Selection and Performance Attribution in Public and Private Real Estate Markets," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 46(2), pages 404-448, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:46:y:2018:i:2:p:404-448
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.12184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12184
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-6229.12184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhilan Feng & Maneechit Pattanapanchai & S. McKay Price & C. F. Sirmans, 2021. "Geographic diversification in real estate investment trusts," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 49(1), pages 267-286, March.
    2. Ying Zhang & J. Andrew Hansz, 2022. "Industry Concentration and U.S. REIT Returns," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 50(1), pages 247-267, March.
    3. Zifeng Feng, 2022. "How Does Local Economy Affect Commercial Property Performance?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 361-383, October.
    4. Wikrom Prombutr & Chanwit Phengpis & Ying Zhang, 2023. "Anomalies in U.S. REIT Returns: Evidence for and against the Q-theory," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 26(1), pages 43-71.
    5. Zifeng Feng & William G. Hardin & Zhonghua Wu, 2022. "Employee productivity and REIT performance," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 50(1), pages 59-88, March.
    6. David C. Ling & Gianluca Marcato & Chen Zheng, 2022. "Does asset location and concentration explain REIT IPO valuation?," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 50(3), pages 672-706, September.
    7. Avis Devine & Andrew Sanderford & Chongyu Wang, 2024. "Sustainability and Private Equity Real Estate Returns," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 161-187, February.
    8. Ryan G. Chacon, 2023. "Tenant Concentration in REITs," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 636-679, April.
    9. David C. Ling & Andy Naranjo & Benjamin Scheick, 2021. "There is no place like home: Information asymmetries, local asset concentration, and portfolio returns," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 49(1), pages 36-74, March.
    10. Zifeng Feng & Zhonghua Wu, 2022. "Local Economy, Asset Location and REIT Firm Growth," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 75-102, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:46:y:2018:i:2:p:404-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/areueea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.