IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reesec/v10y1982i4p421-441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Housing and the Economy: Popular Myths

Author

Listed:
  • Robert M. Buckley
  • Robert A. Van Order

Abstract

This paper identifies and tries to clarify the effects of a number of changes in the system of delivering mortgage credit and housing subsidies. First, we examine the trends in housing and mortgage market data and policy. This review highlights the perceived relationships of these sectors to the rest of the economy. We then focus on and develop the relationship between four issues that have been fundamental stumbling blocks to the development of effective policy. The issues are: (1) homeownership affordability, (2) measures of housing needs, (3) the costs of cycles in housing production, and (4) the effects of federal mortgage credit programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert M. Buckley & Robert A. Van Order, 1982. "Housing and the Economy: Popular Myths," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 10(4), pages 421-441, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:10:y:1982:i:4:p:421-441
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.00273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00273
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-6229.00273?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lerman, Donald L., 1985. "The Affordability Of Urban And Rural Rental Housing," Staff Reports 277775, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. H A Morrow-Jones, 1988. "The Housing Life-Cycle and the Transition from Renting to Owning a Home in the United States: A Multistate Analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 20(9), pages 1165-1184, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:10:y:1982:i:4:p:421-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/areueea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.