IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/perwir/v4y2003i2p177-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Schneewittchen im Land der Klapperschlangen: Evaluation eines Evaluators

Author

Listed:
  • Heinrich W. Ursprung

Abstract

This is a comment on a ranking of German economics departments published by a semi‐official institution, the Center for Higher Education Development (CHE). It is shown that the CHE ranking is highly misleading because the publication output is not weighted according to quality. The CHE ranking is compared to the results of four recent ranking studies commissioned by the European Economic Association (EEA) and an earlier ranking of German, Austrian and Swiss economics departments. For the readers from Austria and Switzerland we include in the appendix a ‘sneak preview’ of the ‘EEA rankings’ which includes the top‐ranked Austrian and Swiss departments.

Suggested Citation

  • Heinrich W. Ursprung, 2003. "Schneewittchen im Land der Klapperschlangen: Evaluation eines Evaluators," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(2), pages 177-190, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:perwir:v:4:y:2003:i:2:p:177-190
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2516.t01-1-00001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2516.t01-1-00001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2516.t01-1-00001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sönke Albers, 2009. "Misleading Rankings of Research in Business," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 10(3), pages 352-363, August.
    2. Marcel Clermont & Alexander Dirksen & Barbara Scheidt & Dirk Tunger, 2017. "Citation metrics as an additional indicator for evaluating research performance? An analysis of their correlations and validity," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 10(2), pages 249-279, October.
    3. Jörg Heining & Jürgen Jerger & Jörg Lingens, 2008. "Deutsche Hochschulkarrieren im Fach Volkswirtschaftslehre. Eine deskriptive Analyse von Lebenslaufdaten," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(3), pages 306-328, August.
    4. Klaus Wohlrabe, 2015. "A Few Remarks on the FAZ Economist Ranking 2014," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 68(09), pages 24-27, May.
    5. Klaus Wohlrabe, 2014. "Das FAZ-Ökonomenranking 2013: Eine kritische Betrachtung," ifo Working Paper Series 183, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    6. Albers, Sönke, 2009. "Discriminating Rankings of Research in Business," EconStor Preprints 24827, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. Robert Hofmeister & Heinrich W. Ursprung, 2008. "Das Handelsblatt Ökonomen‐Ranking 2007: Eine kritische Beurteilung," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(3), pages 254-266, August.
    8. Dessauer, Benedict & Emrich, Eike & Klein, Markus & Pierdzioch, Christian, 2013. "Zur Evaluation wissenschaftlicher Publikationsleistungen in der Sportwissenschaft," Working Papers of the European Institute for Socioeconomics 3, European Institute for Socioeconomics (EIS), Saarbrücken.
    9. Klaus Wohlrabe, 2014. "A Criticism of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung Economist Ranking 2013," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 67(13), pages 63-67, July.
    10. Hefeker Carsten & Potrafke Niklas, 2021. "Heinrich W. Ursprung – Herausragender Ökonom, Mentor und Ratgeber," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 22(4), pages 370-374, November.
    11. Lenger Alexander & Goldschmidt Nils, 2011. "Ordnungsökonomik als angewandte Wissenschaft. Zur notwendigen Zusammenführung von Theorie und Praxis / Constitutional Economics as an Applied Social Science. About the Essential Combination of Theory ," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 62(1), pages 343-364, January.
    12. Bielecki, Andre & Albers, Sönke, 2012. "Eine Analyse der Forschungseffizienz deutscher betriebswirtschaftlicher Fachbereiche basierend auf den Daten des Centrums für Hochschulentwicklung (CHE)," EconStor Preprints 57429, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    13. Sönke Albers, 2009. "Misleading Rankings of Research in Business," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 10(3), pages 352-363, August.
    14. Albers, Sönke, 2008. "Three Failed Attempts of Joint Rankings of Research in Economics and Business," MPRA Paper 12868, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 Jan 2009.
    15. Martin Steininger & Bernd Süssmuth, 2005. "Elfenbeinligen und ihre Erfassung: Ein Kommentar und eine neuerliche Messung der Publikationstätigkeit der Wirtschaftsforschungsinstitute im deutschsprachigen Raum: 1989–2003," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 6(3), pages 409-420, August.
    16. Albers, Sönke & Bielecki, Andre, 2012. "Wovon hängt die Leistung in Forschung und Lehre ab? Eine Analyse deutscher betriebswirtschaftlicher Fachbereiche basierend auf den Daten des Centrums für Hochschulentwicklung," EconStor Preprints 57428, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    17. Miriam Hein, 2006. "How Did Economic Research in Switzerland Develop since the Beginning 90s?," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 142(II), pages 285-306, June.

    More about this item

    Lists

    This item is featured on the following reading lists, Wikipedia, or ReplicationWiki pages:
    1. Rankings of Economists, Economics Departments and Economics Journals

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:perwir:v:4:y:2003:i:2:p:177-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfsocea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.