IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/manch2/v59y1991i4p408-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Displacement Effect on Government Expenditure of Two Oil Crises: Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Nomura, Masuo

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the displacement effect on government expenditure for Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States over the periods of the first and second oil price shocks. Following J. Diamond (1977) and P. A. Watt (1978), the displacement effect can be interpreted as a structural change. The author examines the displacement effect by using the Chow test and the modified Wald test proposed by Y. Honda and K. Ohtani (1986). Copyright 1991 by Blackwell Publishers Ltd and The Victoria University of Manchester

Suggested Citation

  • Nomura, Masuo, 1991. "The Displacement Effect on Government Expenditure of Two Oil Crises: Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 59(4), pages 408-418, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:manch2:v:59:y:1991:i:4:p:408-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gemmell, Norman & Morrissey, Oliver & Pinar, Abuzer, 1999. "Fiscal illusion and the demand for government expenditures in the UK," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 687-704, November.
    2. Fernando Martín-Mayoral & Juan Fernández Sastre, 2017. "Determinants of social spending in Latin America during and after the Washington consensus: a dynamic panel error-correction model analysis," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 26(1), pages 1-32, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manch2:v:59:y:1991:i:4:p:408-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.