IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jscmgt/v59y2023i4p42-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability‐related transgressions in global supply chains: When do legitimacy spillovers hurt buying firms the most?

Author

Listed:
  • Ivana Mateska
  • Christian Busse
  • Andrew P. Kach
  • Stephan M. Wagner

Abstract

In a globalized world, buying firms increasingly face criticism regarding sustainability‐related transgressions in their supply chains, yet scholarship concerning whether such negative press has any bottom‐line effects has only just begun emerging. This study develops and tests theory on the relationship between reported supplier sustainability incidents and the associated stock price impact for the buying firm. An event study comprising 1699 events related to 374 buying firms supports our hypothesis that media coverage of environmental, social, or governance‐related transgressions in the supply chain results in decreased market capitalization for the buying firm. A subsequent regression analysis indicates that the influence potential of information intermediaries, the country‐level sustainability risk of the supplier, and the industry‐level sustainability risk of the buying firm all affect the magnitude of the investors' reaction. Conversely, the severity of the incident does not predict the magnitude of the stock price reaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivana Mateska & Christian Busse & Andrew P. Kach & Stephan M. Wagner, 2023. "Sustainability‐related transgressions in global supply chains: When do legitimacy spillovers hurt buying firms the most?," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(4), pages 42-78, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:59:y:2023:i:4:p:42-78
    DOI: 10.1111/jscm.12308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12308
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jscm.12308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:59:y:2023:i:4:p:42-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1523-2409 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.