IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jpbect/v2y2000i2p243-272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taxpayer Disclosure and Penalty Laws

Author

Listed:
  • Paul J. Beck
  • Jon S. Davis
  • Woon‐Oh Jung

Abstract

The consequences of a penalty exemption available to U.S. taxpayers who disclose aggressive reporting positions is examined via a game theoretic model. Results indicate that (i) the tax agency's expected revenue collections (net of audit costs) decline under the disclosure exemption, and (ii) the impact of disclosure regulations depends on the taxpayer's type. Of particular interest, we find that taxpayers who are likely to prevail on an uncertain issue decrease their expected payments although they do not disclose in equilibrium. The impact on the amount of resources absorbed by the tax collection process is also examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul J. Beck & Jon S. Davis & Woon‐Oh Jung, 2000. "Taxpayer Disclosure and Penalty Laws," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 2(2), pages 243-272, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:2:y:2000:i:2:p:243-272
    DOI: 10.1111/1097-3923.00038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1097-3923.00038
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1097-3923.00038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blaufus, Kay & Möhlmann, Axel & Schwäbe, Alexander, 2016. "Corporate tax minimization and stock price reactions," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 204, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    2. Lee, Ye Ji, 2021. "The effects of analysts’ tax expense forecast accuracy on corporate tax avoidance: An international analysis," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    3. Stefan Dodds, 2002. "Privacy And Endogenous Monitoring Choice When Private Information Is A Public Good," Working Paper 1010, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    4. Jordi Caballé & Ariadna Dumitrescu, 2016. "Disclosure of Corporate Tax Reports, Tax Enforcement, and Insider Trading," Working Papers 911, Barcelona School of Economics.
    5. Caballé, Jordi & Dumitrescu, Ariadna, 2020. "Disclosure of corporate tax reports, tax enforcement, and price information," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    6. Brushwood, James D. & Johnston, Derek M. & Lusch, Stephen J., 2018. "The effect of tax audit outcomes on the reporting and valuation of unrecognized tax benefits," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1-11.
    7. Markus Diller & Pia Kortebusch & Georg Schneider & Caren Sureth-Sloane, 2017. "Boon or Bane? Advance Tax Rulings as a Measure to Mitigate Tax Uncertainty and Foster Investment," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 441-468, July.
    8. Blaufus, Kay & Hundsdoerfer, Jochen & Jacob, Martin & Sünwoldt, Matthias, 2016. "Does legality matter? The case of tax avoidance and evasion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 182-206.
    9. Blaufus, Kay & Schöndube, Jens Robert & Wielenberg, Stefan, 2020. "Strategic interactions between tax and statutory auditors and different information regimes: Implications for tax audit efficiency," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 249, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:2:y:2000:i:2:p:243-272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/apettea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.