IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v75y2013i2p369-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adjusting treatment effect estimates by post-stratification in randomized experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Luke W. Miratrix
  • Jasjeet S. Sekhon
  • Bin Yu

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke W. Miratrix & Jasjeet S. Sekhon & Bin Yu, 2013. "Adjusting treatment effect estimates by post-stratification in randomized experiments," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(2), pages 369-396, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:75:y:2013:i:2:p:369-396
    DOI: 10.1111/rssb.2013.75.issue-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/10.1111/rssb.2013.75.issue-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssb.2013.75.issue-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edward Wu & Johann A. Gagnon-Bartsch, 2018. "The LOOP Estimator: Adjusting for Covariates in Randomized Experiments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 42(4), pages 458-488, August.
    2. Yue, Lili & Li, Gaorong & Lian, Heng & Wan, Xiang, 2019. "Regression adjustment for treatment effect with multicollinearity in high dimensions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 17-35.
    3. Hennessy Jonathan & Dasgupta Tirthankar & Miratrix Luke & Pattanayak Cassandra & Sarkar Pradipta, 2016. "A Conditional Randomization Test to Account for Covariate Imbalance in Randomized Experiments," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 61-80, March.
    4. Peter Z. Schochet, "undated". "Statistical Theory for the RCT-YES Software: Design-Based Causal Inference for RCTs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a0c005c003c242308a92c02dc, Mathematica Policy Research.
    5. James Bisbee & Rajeev Dehejia & Cristian Pop-Eleches & Cyrus Samii, 2017. "Local Instruments, Global Extrapolation: External Validity of the Labor Supply-Fertility Local Average Treatment Effect," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(S1), pages 99-147.
    6. Middleton Joel A. & Aronow Peter M., 2015. "Unbiased Estimation of the Average Treatment Effect in Cluster-Randomized Experiments," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1-2), pages 39-75, December.
    7. Richard Berk & Emil Pitkin & Lawrence Brown & Andreas Buja & Edward George & Linda Zhao, 2013. "Covariance Adjustments for the Analysis of Randomized Field Experiments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 37(3-4), pages 170-196, June.
    8. Nicole E. Pashley & Luke W. Miratrix, 2021. "Insights on Variance Estimation for Blocked and Matched Pairs Designs," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(3), pages 271-296, June.
    9. Jason J Jones & Robert M Bond & Eytan Bakshy & Dean Eckles & James H Fowler, 2017. "Social influence and political mobilization: Further evidence from a randomized experiment in the 2012 U.S. presidential election," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-9, April.
    10. Ding, Peng, 2021. "The Frisch–Waugh–Lovell theorem for standard errors," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Nicole E. Pashley & Luke W. Miratrix, 2022. "Block What You Can, Except When You Shouldn’t," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 47(1), pages 69-100, February.
    12. Peng Ding, 2020. "The Frisch--Waugh--Lovell Theorem for Standard Errors," Papers 2009.06621, arXiv.org.
    13. Donald P. Green & Winston Lin & Claudia Gerber, 2018. "Optimal Allocation of Interviews to Baseline and Endline Surveys in Place-Based Randomized Trials and Quasi-Experiments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 42(4), pages 391-422, August.
    14. Peter Z. Schochet, 2020. "Analyzing Grouped Administrative Data for RCTs Using Design-Based Methods," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(1), pages 32-57, February.
    15. Lu, Jiannan, 2016. "Covariate adjustment in randomization-based causal inference for 2K factorial designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 11-20.
    16. Peng Ding & Avi Feller & Luke Miratrix, 2016. "Randomization inference for treatment effect variation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(3), pages 655-671, June.
    17. Haoge Chang & Joel Middleton & P. M. Aronow, 2021. "Exact Bias Correction for Linear Adjustment of Randomized Controlled Trials," Papers 2110.08425, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    18. Haoge Chang, 2023. "Design-based Estimation Theory for Complex Experiments," Papers 2311.06891, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:75:y:2013:i:2:p:369-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.