IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v169y2006i2p289-303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new parametric family for modelling cumulative incidence functions: application to breast cancer data

Author

Listed:
  • Jong‐Hyeon Jeong

Abstract

Summary. Competing risks situations can be encountered in many research areas such as medicine, social science and engineering. The main stream of analyses of those competing risks data has been nonparametric or semiparametric in the statistical literature. We propose a new parametric family to parameterize the cumulative incidence function completely. The new distribution is sufficiently flexible to fit various shapes of hazard patterns in survival data and increases the efficiency of the cumulative incidence estimates over the distribution‐free approaches. A simple two‐sample parametric test statistic is also proposed to compare the cumulative incidence functions between two groups at a given time point. The new parametric approach is illustrated by using breast cancer data sets from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project.

Suggested Citation

  • Jong‐Hyeon Jeong, 2006. "A new parametric family for modelling cumulative incidence functions: application to breast cancer data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(2), pages 289-303, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:169:y:2006:i:2:p:289-303
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00409.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00409.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00409.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Bryant & James J. Dignam, 2004. "Semiparametric Models for Cumulative Incidence Functions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 182-190, March.
    2. Paul Meier & Theodore Karrison & Rick Chappell & Hui Xie, 2004. "The Price of Kaplan-Meier," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 890-896, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steve Su, 2016. "Flexible modelling of survival curves for censored data," Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diana Hechavarría & Charles Matthews & Paul Reynolds, 2016. "Does start-up financing influence start-up speed? Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 137-167, January.
    2. David Giles, 2007. "Survival of the hippest: life at the top of the hot 100," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(15), pages 1877-1887.
    3. Gregory Fridman & Maria Lapina, 2016. "Maximum likelihood approach for demand unconstraining problem with censoring information incompleteness," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(1), pages 37-51, February.
    4. Yi Qian & Hui Xie, 2011. "No Customer Left Behind: A Distribution-Free Bayesian Approach to Accounting for Missing Xs in Marketing Models," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 717-736, July.
    5. Bieszk-Stolorz Beata, 2017. "Cumulative Incidence Function in Studies on the Duration of the Unemployment Exit Process," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 138-150, June.
    6. Kaishev, Vladimir K. & Dimitrova, Dimitrina S. & Haberman, Steven, 2007. "Modelling the joint distribution of competing risks survival times using copula functions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 339-361, November.
    7. Szilárd Nemes, 2023. "Asymptotic Relative Efficiency of Parametric and Nonparametric Survival Estimators," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Martin Jullum & Nils Lid Hjort, 2019. "What price semiparametric Cox regression?," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 406-438, July.
    9. Beata Bieszk-Stolorz, 2020. "Gender as a Differentiating Factor in the Process of Exiting Unemployment: The Case of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 819-833.
    10. Judith J. Lok & Shu Yang & Brian Sharkey & Michael D. Hughes, 2018. "Estimation of the cumulative incidence function under multiple dependent and independent censoring mechanisms," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 201-223, April.
    11. Szilárd Nemes & Erik Bülow & Andreas Gustavsson, 2020. "A Brief Overview of Restricted Mean Survival Time Estimators and Associated Variances," Stats, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Jiyang Wen & Chen Hu & Mei‐Cheng Wang, 2023. "Joint inference for competing risks data using multiple endpoints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1635-1645, September.
    13. Yicheng Zhou & Zhenzhou Lu & Yan Shi & Kai Cheng, 2019. "The copula-based method for statistical analysis of step-stress accelerated life test with dependent competing failure modes," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 401-418, June.
    14. Dimitrova, Dimitrina S. & Haberman, Steven & Kaishev, Vladimir K., 2013. "Dependent competing risks: Cause elimination and its impact on survival," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 464-477.
    15. Gang Han & Michael J. Schell & Heping Zhang & Daniel Zelterman & Lajos Pusztai & Kerin Adelson & Christos Hatzis, 2017. "Testing violations of the exponential assumption in cancer clinical trials with survival endpoints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 687-695, June.
    16. Pierre‐Yves Deléamont & Elvezio Ronchetti, 2022. "Robust inference with censored survival data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1496-1533, December.
    17. Diana M. Hechavarría & Charles H. Matthews & Paul D. Reynolds, 2016. "Does start-up financing influence start-up speed? Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 137-167, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:169:y:2006:i:2:p:289-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.