IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v58y2021i3p879-886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Future of the Corporation

Author

Listed:
  • Gerardo Patriotta

Abstract

The articles featured in this Point‐Counterpoint develop provocative and yet contrasting views on the role of corporations in contemporary society: the point by Colin Mayer advocates a view of the corporation as a purpose‐driven institution that can become a vehicle for economic and social prosperity. The counterpoint by Jerry Davis emphasizes the declining role of contemporary corporations, and argues for the need to develop both internal and external corporate democracy. Building on the dialogue between purpose and democracy, this article reflects on the future of the corporation within a society characterized by the pervasive presence of global risks. Four major challenges for corporate purpose and democracy are highlighted: changes in corporate business models, inequality and safety, institutional partnerships, and new forms of corporate social engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerardo Patriotta, 2021. "The Future of the Corporation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 879-886, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:58:y:2021:i:3:p:879-886
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12673
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerardo Patriotta & Jean‐Pascal Gond & Friederike Schultz, 2011. "Maintaining Legitimacy: Controversies, Orders of Worth, and Public Justifications," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(8), pages 1804-1836, December.
    2. Gerard George & Karim R. Lakhani & Phanish Puranam, 2020. "What has changed? The Impact of Covid Pandemic on the Technology and Innovation Management Research Agenda," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(8), pages 1754-1758, December.
    3. Thomas C. Lawton & Sinziana Dorobantu & Tazeeb S. Rajwani & Pei Sun, 2020. "The Implications of COVID‐19 for Nonmarket Strategy Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(8), pages 1732-1736, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gregor Bouville & Jocelyne Barreau, 2021. "Les Utopies Du Travail Et Le Management : Du 19e Au 21e Siecles," Post-Print halshs-03403834, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Muzio & Jonathan Doh, 2021. "COVID‐19 and the Future of Management Studies. Insights from Leading Scholars," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1371-1377, July.
    2. Wan Ri Ho & Omid Maghazei & Torbjørn H. Netland, 2022. "Understanding manufacturing repurposing: a multiple-case study of ad hoc healthcare product production during COVID-19," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1257-1269, December.
    3. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    4. Paolo E. Giordani & Francesco Rullani, 2020. "The Digital Revolution and COVID-19," Working Papers 06, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    5. Hossfeld, Heiko, 2018. "Legitimation and institutionalization of managerial practices. The role of organizational rhetoric," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 9-21.
    6. Sini Forssell & Leena Lankoski, 2017. "Navigating the tensions and agreements in alternative food and sustainability: a convention theoretical perspective on alternative food retail," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(3), pages 513-527, September.
    7. Jon Reast & François Maon & Adam Lindgreen & Joëlle Vanhamme, 2013. "Legitimacy-Seeking Organizational Strategies in Controversial Industries: A Case Study Analysis and a Bidimensional Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 139-153, November.
    8. Isabelle Huault & Benjamin Taupin, 2012. "Les fondements moraux d’une logique institutionnelle. Contestation, controverses et stabilité," Post-Print hal-01637436, HAL.
    9. Xiao-xiao Liu & Feng Xiong & Xingqiang Du, 2023. "Innovator or Troublemaker? The Co-evolution of Ethical Controversies, Legitimation and Institutionalisation of the Ridesharing Firms in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(4), pages 723-737, September.
    10. Blanc, Antoine & Huault, Isabelle, 2014. "Against the digital revolution? Institutional maintenance and artefacts within the French recorded music industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 10-23.
    11. Scherer, Andreas, 2013. "Legitimacy Strategies in a Globalized World: Organizing for Complex and Heterogeneous Environments," Papers 566, World Trade Institute.
    12. Sayed Fayaz Ahmad & Muhammad Mansoor Alam & Mohd. Khairil Rahmat & Muhammad Khalil Shahid & Mahnaz Aslam & Nur Agus Salim & Mohammed Hasan Ali Al-Abyadh, 2023. "Leading Edge or Bleeding Edge: Designing a Framework for the Adoption of AI Technology in an Educational Organization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Hensel, Przemysław G., 2019. "Supporting replication research in management journals: Qualitative analysis of editorials published between 1970 and 2015," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 45-57.
    14. Maria Joutsenvirta, 2013. "Executive Pay and Legitimacy: Changing Discursive Battles Over the Morality of Excessive Manager Compensation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 459-477, September.
    15. Giorgia Miotto & Marc Polo López & Josep Rom Rodríguez, 2019. "Gender Equality and UN Sustainable Development Goals: Priorities and Correlations in the Top Business Schools’ Communication and Legitimation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Andrew Crane & Sarah Glozer, 2016. "Researching Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Themes, Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(7), pages 1223-1252, November.
    17. Renata Blanc & Charles H. Cho & Joanne Sopt & Manuel Castelo Branco, 2019. "Disclosure Responses to a Corruption Scandal: The Case of Siemens AG," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 545-561, May.
    18. Masoud Shadnam & Andrey Bykov & Ajnesh Prasad, 2021. "Opening Constructive Dialogues Between Business Ethics Research and the Sociology of Morality: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 201-211, May.
    19. Zahra, Shaker A., 2022. "International entrepreneurship by family firms post Covid," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2).
    20. Srikant, Chethan D., 2019. "Impression management strategies to gain regulatory approval," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 136-153.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:58:y:2021:i:3:p:879-886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.